Lune

NeurIPS2025Top-tier venue

Is the acquisition worth the cost? Surrogate losses for Consistent Two-stage Classifiers

Florence Regol, Joseph Cotnareanu, Theodore Glavas, Mark Coates

2025Year
3Citations
1Top-tier citations

Abstract

Recent years have witnessed the emergence of a spectrum of foundation models, covering a broad range of capabilities and costs. Often, we effectively use foundation models as feature generators and train classifiers that use the outputs of these models to make decisions. In this paper, we consider an increasingly relevant setting where we have two classifier stages. The first stage has access to features x and has the option to make a classification decision or defer, while incurring a cost, to a second classifier that has access to features x and z . This is similar to the “learning to defer” setting, with the important difference that we train both classifiers jointly, and the second classifier has access to more information. The natural loss for this setting is an ℓ 01 c loss, where a penalty is paid for incorrect classification, as in ℓ 01 , but an additional penalty c is paid for consulting the second classifier. The ℓ 01 c loss is unwieldy for training. Our primary contribution in this paper is the derivation of a hinge-based surrogate loss ℓ chinge that is much more amenable to training but also satisfies the property that ℓ chinge -consistency implies ℓ 01 c -consistency.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext bca550ce-8bfa-4a5f-b6c2-5c3e8979876f

Cited by top-tier papers1

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on16

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines