Unforgeability in Stochastic Gradient Descent
Teodora Baluta, Ivica Nikolic, Racchit Jain, Divesh Aggarwal, Prateek Saxena
Abstract
Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is a popular training algorithm, a cornerstone of modern machine learning systems. Several security applications benefit from determining if SGD executions are forgeable, i.e., whether the model parameters seen at a given step are obtainable by more than one distinct set of data samples. In this paper, we present the first attempt at proving impossibility of such forgery. We furnish a set of conditions, which are efficiently checkable on concrete checkpoints seen during training runs, under which checkpoints are provably unforgeable at that step. Our experiments show that the conditions are somewhat mild and hence always satisfied at checkpoints sampled in our experiments. Our results sharply contrast prior findings at a high level: We show that checkpoints we find to be provably unforgeable have been deemed to be forgeable using the same methodology and experimental setup suggested in prior work. This discrepancy arises because of unspecified subtleties in definitions. We experimentally confirm that the distinction matters, i.e., small errors amplify during training to produce significantly observable difference in final models trained. We hope our results serve as a cautionary note on the role of algebraic precision in forgery definitions and related security arguments. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Software and application security; • Computing methodologies → Algebraic algorithms; Neural networks.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- Deep Learning with Differential PrivacyMartín Abadi, Andy Chu, Ian J. Goodfellow, H. Brendan McMahan et al.CCS 2016 · 7,620 citations
- Inverting Gradients - How easy is it to break privacy in federated learning?Jonas Geiping, Hartmut Bauermeister, Hannah Dröge, Michael MoellerNeurIPS 2020 · 1,822 citations
- Evaluating Gradient Inversion Attacks and Defenses in Federated LearningYangsibo Huang, Samyak Gupta, Zhao Song, Kai Li et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 419 citations
- Gradient Inversion with Generative Image PriorJinwoo Jeon, Jaechang Kim, Kangwook Lee, Sewoong Oh et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 216 citations
- R-GAP: Recursive Gradient Attack on PrivacyJunyi Zhu, Matthew B. BlaschkoICLR 2021 · 157 citations
Related papers
- Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and PracticeHengrui Jia, Mohammad Yaghini, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Natalie Dullerud et al.S&P 2021 · 132 citations
- Provenance of Training without Training Data: Towards Privacy-Preserving DNN Model Ownership VerificationYunpeng Liu, Kexin Li, Zhuotao Liu, Bihan Wen et al.WWW 2023 · 13 citations
- Deep Learning with Plausible DeniabilityWenxuan Bao, Shan Jin, Hadi Abdullah, Anderson Nascimento et al.NeurIPS 2025
- Comprehensive Privacy Analysis of Deep Learning: Passive and Active White-box Inference Attacks against Centralized and Federated LearningMilad Nasr, Reza Shokri, Amir HoumansadrS&P 2019 · 1,778 citations
- Provable Generalization of SGD-trained Neural Networks of Any Width in the Presence of Adversarial Label NoiseSpencer Frei, Yuan Cao, Quanquan GuICML 2021 · 22 citations
