Seeing What Matters: Visual Preference Policy Optimization for Visual Generation
Ziqi Ni, Yuanzhi Liang, Rui Li, Yi Zhou, Haibin Huang, Chi Zhang, Xuelong Li
Abstract
Reinforcement learning (RL) has become a powerful tool for post-training visual generative models, with Group Relative Policy Optimization (GRPO) increasingly used to align generators with human preferences. However, existing GRPO pipelines rely on a single scalar reward per sample, treating each image or video as a holistic entity and ignoring the rich spatial and temporal structure of visual content. This coarse supervision hinders the correction of localized artifacts and the modeling of fine-grained perceptual cues. We introduce Visual Preference Policy Optimization (ViPO), a GRPO variant that lifts scalar feedback into structured, pixel-level advantages. ViPO employs a Perceptual Structuring Module that uses pretrained vision backbones to construct spatially and temporally aware advantage maps, redistributing optimization pressure toward perceptually important regions while preserving the stability of standard GRPO. Across both image and video benchmarks, ViPO consistently outperforms vanilla GRPO, improving in-domain alignment with human-preference rewards and enhancing generalization on out-of-domain evaluations. The method is architecture-agnostic, lightweight, and fully compatible with existing GRPO training pipelines, providing a more expressive and informative learning signal for visual generation.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bc18a431-66f7-433b-8c16-4f681e6b4bfeCited by top-tier papers2
- CogniVerse: Revolutionizing Multi-Modal Retrieval-Augmented Generation with Cognitive Reflection and Geometric ReasoningXiang Fang, Wanlong Fang, Changshuo WangCVPR 2026 · 17 citations
- Synthetic Curriculum Reinforces Compositional Text-to-Image GenerationShijian Wang, Runhao Fu, Siyi Zhao, Qingqin Zhan et al.CVPR 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic ModelsJonathan Ho, Ajay Jain, Pieter AbbeelNeurIPS 2020 · 35,902 citations
- Segment AnythingAlexander Kirillov, Eric Mintun, Nikhila Ravi, Hanzi Mao et al.ICCV 2023 · 13,211 citations
- Directly Denoising Diffusion ModelsDan Zhang, Jingjing Wang, Feng LuoICML 2024 · 11,724 citations
- ImageReward: Learning and Evaluating Human Preferences for Text-to-Image GenerationJiazheng Xu, Xiao Liu, Yuchen Wu, Yuxuan Tong et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 1,310 citations
- Score-Based Generative Modeling through Stochastic Differential EquationsYang Song, Jascha Sohl-Dickstein, Diederik P. Kingma, Abhishek Kumar et al.ICLR 2021 · 1,270 citations
Related papers
- Learning What to Trust: Bayesian Prior-Guided Optimization for Visual GenerationRuiying Liu, Yuanzhi Liang, Haibin Huang, Tianshu Yu et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
- Principled RL for Flow Matching Emerges from the Chunk-level Policy OptimizationYifu Luo, Haoyuan Sun, Xinhao Hu, Penghui Du et al.ICML 2026 · 12 citations
- VAR RL Done Right: Tackling Asynchronous Policy Conflicts in Visual Autoregressive GenerationShikun Sun, Liao Qu, Huichao Zhang, Yiheng Liu et al.CVPR 2026 · 2 citations
- Delving into RL for Image Generation with CoT: A Study on DPO vs. GRPOChengzhuo Tong, Ziyu Guo, Renrui Zhang, Wenyu Shan et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 39 citations
- GDPO-SR: Group Direct Preference Optimization for One-Step Generative Image Super-ResolutionQiaosi Yi, Shuai Li, Rongyuan Wu, Lingchen Sun et al.CVPR 2026 · 4 citations
