Lune

ACL Findings2023

Revisit Few-shot Intent Classification with PLMs: Direct Fine-tuning vs. Continual Pre-training

Haode Zhang, Haowen Liang, Li-Ming Zhan, Xiao-Ming Wu, Albert Y. S. Lam

Abstract

We consider the task of few-shot intent detection, which involves training a deep learning model to classify utterances based on their underlying intents using only a small amount of labeled data. The current approach to address this problem is through continual pretraining, i.e., fine-tuning pre-trained language models (PLMs) on external resources (e.g., conversational corpora, public intent detection datasets, or natural language understanding datasets) before using them as utterance encoders for training an intent classifier. In this paper, we show that continual pre-training may not be essential, since the overfitting problem of PLMs on this task may not be as serious as expected. Specifically, we find that directly fine-tuning PLMs on only a handful of labeled examples already yields decent results compared to methods that employ continual pre-training, and the performance gap diminishes rapidly as the number of labeled data increases. To maximize the utilization of the limited available data, we propose a context augmentation method and leverage sequential self-distillation to boost performance. Comprehensive experiments on real-world benchmarks show that given only two or more labeled samples per class, direct fine-tuning outperforms many strong baselines that utilize external data sources for continual pre-training. The code can be found at https://github.com/ hdzhang-code/DFTPlus.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 2 top-tier papers that cite it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers2

  1. Improving Clustering with Positive Pairs Generated from LLM-Driven LabelsXiaotong Zhang, Ying LiEMNLP 2025
  2. IntentionFrame: A Semi-Structured, Multi-Aspect Framework for Fine-Grained Conversational Intention UnderstandingJinggui Liang, Dung Vo, Lizi LiaoEMNLP 2025

Builds on21

  1. True Few-Shot Learning with Language ModelsEthan Perez, Douwe Kiela, Kyunghyun ChoNeurIPS 2021 · 547 citations
  2. On the Stability of Fine-tuning BERT: Misconceptions, Explanations, and Strong BaselinesMarius Mosbach, Maksym Andriushchenko, Dietrich KlakowICLR 2021 · 448 citations
  3. Generating Training Data with Language Models: Towards Zero-Shot Language UnderstandingYu Meng, Jiaxin Huang, Yu Zhang, Jiawei HanNeurIPS 2022 · 309 citations
  4. Self-Distillation Amplifies Regularization in Hilbert SpaceHossein Mobahi, Mehrdad Farajtabar, Peter L. BartlettNeurIPS 2020 · 298 citations
  5. Mixout: Effective Regularization to Finetune Large-scale Pretrained Language ModelsCheolhyoung Lee, Kyunghyun Cho, Wanmo KangICLR 2020 · 233 citations

Related papers

  1. Effectiveness of Pre-training for Few-shot Intent ClassificationHaode Zhang, Yuwei Zhang, Li-Ming Zhan, Jiaxin Chen et al.EMNLP Findings 2021 · 40 citations
  2. On Collaborating Small and Large Models For Few-shot Intent DetectionPeng Chen, Bang WangEMNLP Findings 2025 · 2 citations
  3. Making Pre-trained Language Models Better Learn Few-Shot Spoken Language Understanding in More Practical ScenariosYufan Wang, Jie Mei, Bowei Zou, Rui Fan et al.ACL Findings 2023 · 4 citations
  4. A Coarse-to-Fine Prototype Learning Approach for Multi-Label Few-Shot Intent DetectionXiaotong Zhang, Xinyi Li, Feng Zhang, Zhiyi Wei et al.EMNLP Findings 2024 · 3 citations
  5. Generate then Refine: Data Augmentation for Zero-shot Intent DetectionI-Fan Lin, Faegheh Hasibi, Suzan VerberneEMNLP Findings 2024 · 5 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines