From Perceptions to Decisions: Wildfire Evacuation Decision Prediction with Behavioral Theory-informed LLMs
Ruxiao Chen, Chenguang Wang, Yuran Sun, Xilei Zhao, Susu Xu
Abstract
Evacuation decision prediction is critical for efficient and effective wildfire response by helping emergency management anticipate traffic congestion and bottlenecks, allocate resources, and minimize negative impacts. Traditional statistical methods for evacuation decision prediction fail to capture the complex and diverse behavioral logic of different individuals. In this work, for the first time, we introduce FLARE, short for facilitating LLM for advanced reasoning on wildfire evacuation decision prediction, a Large Language Model (LLM)-based framework that integrates behavioral theories and models to streamline the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning and subsequently integrate with memory-based Reinforcement Learning (RL) module to provide accurate evacuation decision prediction and understanding. Our proposed method addresses the limitations of using existing LLMs for evacuation behavioral predictions, such as limited survey data, mismatching with behavioral theory, conflicting individual preferences, implicit and complex mental states, and intractable mental statebehavior mapping. Experiments on three postwildfire survey datasets show an average of 20.47% performance improvement over traditional theory-informed behavioral models, with strong cross-event generalizability. Our
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bbc8f991-f9ca-4997-b64e-d7445b15cb0bBuilds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Large Language Models are Zero-Shot ReasonersTakeshi Kojima, Shixiang Shane Gu, Machel Reid, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,168 citations
- Reflexion: language agents with verbal reinforcement learningNoah Shinn, Federico Cassano, Ashwin Gopinath, Karthik Narasimhan et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,828 citations
- Language Models Don't Always Say What They Think: Unfaithful Explanations in Chain-of-Thought PromptingMiles Turpin, Julian Michael, Ethan Perez, Samuel R. BowmanNeurIPS 2023 · 1,792 citations
- Self-Consistency Improves Chain of Thought Reasoning in Language ModelsXuezhi Wang, Jason Wei, Dale Schuurmans, Quoc V. Le et al.ICLR 2023 · 681 citations
Related papers
- FLAIR: Steering LLM Mathematical Problem Solving based on A Fuzzy-Logic-AssIsted ReasonerHao Wu, Hongru Sun, Wanqing Li, Xinguo Yu et al.ACL 2026
- ThinkRec: Thinking-based recommendation via LLMQihang Yu, Kairui Fu, Zheqi Lv, Shengyu Zhang et al.WWW 2026 · 10 citations
- Token-Efficient Long-Term Interest Sketching and Internalized Reasoning for LLM-based RecommendationZhihao Ding, Jinming Li, Shuai Mu, Jieming ShiICLR 2026
- FLARE: Faithful Logic-Aided Reasoning and ExplorationErik Arakelyan, Pasquale Minervini, Patrick S. H. Lewis, Pat Verga et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
- Multi-Modal Grounded Planning and Efficient Replanning for Learning Embodied Agents with a Few ExamplesTaewoong Kim, Byeonghwi Kim, Jonghyun ChoiAAAI 2025 · 8 citations
