Latent Graph Inference with Limited Supervision
Jianglin Lu, Yi Xu, Huan Wang, Yue Bai, Yun Fu
Abstract
Latent graph inference (LGI) aims to jointly learn the underlying graph structure and node representations from data features. However, existing LGI methods commonly suffer from the issue of supervision starvation, where massive edge weights are learned without semantic supervision and do not contribute to the training loss. Consequently, these supervision-starved weights, which may determine the predictions of testing samples, cannot be semantically optimal, resulting in poor generalization. In this paper, we observe that this issue is actually caused by the graph sparsification operation, which severely destroys the important connections established between pivotal nodes and labeled ones. To address this, we propose to restore the corrupted affinities and replenish the missed supervision for better LGI. The key challenge then lies in identifying the critical nodes and recovering the corrupted affinities. We begin by defining the pivotal nodes as -hop starved nodes, which can be identified based on a given adjacency matrix. Considering the high computational burden, we further present a more efficient alternative inspired by CUR matrix decomposition. Subsequently, we eliminate the starved nodes by reconstructing the destroyed connections. Extensive experiments on representative benchmarks demonstrate that reducing the starved nodes consistently improves the performance of state-of-the-art LGI methods, especially under extremely limited supervision (6.12% improvement on Pubmed with a labeling rate of only 0.3%).
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bba5d638-0168-4e2f-847c-1f8563a4dfa6Cited by top-tier papers4
- Uncertainty-Aware Graph Structure LearningShen Han, Zhiyao Zhou, Jiawei Chen, Zhezheng Hao et al.WWW 2025 · 9 citations
- The Indra Representation Hypothesis for Multimodal AlignmentJianglin Lu, Hailing Wang, Kuo Yang, Yitian Zhang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 8 citations
- Dependency Parsing is More Parameter-Efficient with NormalizationPaolo Gajo, Domenic Rosati, Hassan Sajjad, Alberto Barrón-CedeñoNeurIPS 2025
- Scale-Free Graph-Language ModelsJianglin Lu, Yixuan Liu, Yitian Zhang, Yun FuICLR 2025
Builds on22
- Open Graph Benchmark: Datasets for Machine Learning on GraphsWeihua Hu, Matthias Fey, Marinka Zitnik, Yuxiao Dong et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 3,935 citations
- E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksVictor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Max WellingICML 2021 · 1,432 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
- Graph Structure Learning for Robust Graph Neural NetworksWei Jin, Yao Ma, Xiaorui Liu, Xianfeng Tang et al.KDD 2020 · 604 citations
- Iterative Deep Graph Learning for Graph Neural Networks: Better and Robust Node EmbeddingsYu Chen, Lingfei Wu, Mohammed J. ZakiNeurIPS 2020 · 559 citations
Related papers
- Graph inference learning for semi-supervised classificationChunyan Xu, Zhen Cui, Xiaobin Hong, Tong Zhang et al.ICLR 2020 · 32 citations
- Towards an Optimal Asymmetric Graph Structure for Robust Semi-supervised Node ClassificationZixing Song, Yifei Zhang, Irwin KingKDD 2022 · 30 citations
- Learning the Latent Structure: A Feature-Centric Approach to Graph Data AugmentationYu Song, Zhigang Hua, Yan Xie, Bingheng Li et al.AAAI 2026
- Discriminative Attribute Graph Clustering Through Topology-Guided Contrastive LearningLing Ding, Zhizhi Yu, Cuiying HuoICML 2026
- Unraveling the Impact of Heterophilic Structures on Graph Positive-Unlabeled LearningYuhao Wu, Jiangchao Yao, Bo Han, Lina Yao et al.ICML 2024 · 5 citations
