In-Place Test-Time Training
Guhao Feng, Shengjie Luo, Kai Hua, Ge Zhang, Wenhao Huang, Di He, Tianle Cai
Abstract
The static "train then deploy" paradigm fundamentally limits Large Language Models (LLMs) from dynamically adapting their weights in response to continuous streams of new information inherent in real-world tasks. Test-Time Training (TTT) offers a compelling alternative by updating a subset of model parameters (fast weights) at inference time, yet its potential in the current LLM ecosystem is hindered by critical barriers including architectural incompatibility, computational inefficiency and misaligned fast weight objectives for language modeling. In this work, we introduce In-Place Test-Time Training (In-Place TTT), a framework that seamlessly endows LLMs with Test-Time Training ability. In-Place TTT treats the final projection matrix of the ubiquitous MLP blocks as its adaptable fast weights, enabling a ``drop-in" enhancement for LLMs without costly retraining from scratch. Furthermore, we replace TTT's generic reconstruction objective with a tailored, theoretically-grounded objective explicitly aligned with the Next-Token-Prediction task governing autoregressive language modeling. This principled objective, combined with an efficient chunk-wise update mechanism, results in a highly scalable algorithm compatible with context parallelism. Extensive experiments validate our framework's effectiveness: as an in-place enhancement, it enables a 4B-parameter model to achieve superior performance on tasks with contexts up to 128k, and when pretrained from scratch, it consistently outperforms competitive TTT-related approaches. Ablation study results further provide deeper insights on our design choices. Collectively, our results establish In-Place TTT as a promising step towards a paradigm of continual learning in LLMs.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext bb8cc161-db36-41af-816a-7e116d785750Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on26
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Transformers are RNNs: Fast Autoregressive Transformers with Linear AttentionAngelos Katharopoulos, Apoorv Vyas, Nikolaos Pappas, François FleuretICML 2020 · 2,665 citations
Related papers
- Test-Time Training Done RightTianyuan Zhang, Sai Bi, Yicong Hong, Kai Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 127 citations
- The Surprising Effectiveness of Test-Time Training for Few-Shot LearningEkin Akyürek, Mehul Damani, Adam Zweiger, Linlu Qiu et al.ICML 2025
- Learning to (Learn at Test Time): RNNs with Expressive Hidden StatesYu Sun, Xinhao Li, Karan Dalal, Jiarui Xu et al.ICML 2025
- Test-Time Learning for Large Language ModelsJinwu Hu, Zitian Zhang, Guohao Chen, Xutao Wen et al.ICML 2025
- TNT: Improving Chunkwise Training for Test-Time MemorizationZeman Li, Ali Behrouz, Yuan Deng, Peilin Zhong et al.ICLR 2026 · 7 citations
