Enhancing Training Data Attribution for Large Language Models with Fitting Error Consideration
Kangxi Wu, Liang Pang, Huawei Shen, Xueqi Cheng
Abstract
The black-box nature of large language models (LLMs) poses challenges in interpreting results, impacting issues such as data intellectual property protection and hallucination tracing. Training data attribution (TDA) methods are considered effective solutions to address these challenges. Most recent TDA methods rely on influence functions, assuming the model achieves minimized empirical risk. However, achieving this criterion is difficult, and sourcing accuracy can be compromised by fitting errors during model training. In this paper, we introduce a novel TDA method called Debias and Denoise Attribution (DDA), which enhances influence functions by addressing fitting errors. Specifically, the debias strategy seeks to improve the performance of influence functions by eliminating the knowledge bias present in the base model before fine-tuning, while the denoise strategy aims to reduce discrepancies in influence scores arising from varying degrees of fitting during the training process through smoothing techniques. Experimental results demonstrate that our method significantly outperforms existing approaches, achieving an averaged AUC of 91.64%. Moreover, DDA exhibits strong generality and scalability across various sources and different-scale models like LLaMA2, QWEN2, and Mistral. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ba6ec9e1-ceb7-453c-b96b-1e74362b8c2aCited by top-tier papers3
- Fairshare Data Pricing via Data Valuation for Large Language ModelsLuyang Zhang, Cathy Jiao, Beibei Li, Chenyan XiongNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- IF-Guide: Influence Function-Guided Detoxification of LLMsZachary Coalson, Juhan Bae, Nicholas Carlini, Sanghyun HongNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- Interpretation Meets Safety: A Survey on Interpretation Methods and Tools for Improving LLM SafetySeongmin Lee, Aeree Cho, Grace C. Kim, Shengyun Peng et al.EMNLP 2025 · 1 citation
Builds on11
- Estimating Training Data Influence by Tracing Gradient DescentGarima Pruthi, Frederick Liu, Satyen Kale, Mukund SundararajanNeurIPS 2020 · 784 citations
- TRAK: Attributing Model Behavior at ScaleSung Min Park, Kristian Georgiev, Andrew Ilyas, Guillaume Leclerc et al.ICML 2023 · 260 citations
- On the Reliability of Watermarks for Large Language ModelsJohn Kirchenbauer, Jonas Geiping, Yuxin Wen, Manli Shu et al.ICLR 2024 · 202 citations
- If Influence Functions are the Answer, Then What is the Question?Juhan Bae, Nathan Ng, Alston Lo, Marzyeh Ghassemi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 185 citations
- Scaling Up Influence FunctionsAndrea Schioppa, Polina Zablotskaia, David Vilar, Artem SokolovAAAI 2022 · 149 citations
Related papers
- Scalable Influence and Fact Tracing for Large Language Model PretrainingTyler A. Chang, Dheeraj Rajagopal, Tolga Bolukbasi, Lucas Dixon et al.ICLR 2025 · 1 citation
- Enhancing Training Data Attribution with Representational OptimizationWeiwei Sun, Haokun Liu, Nikhil Kandpal, Colin A. Raffel et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
- What is Your Data Worth to GPT? LLM-Scale Data Valuation with Influence FunctionsSang Keun Choe, Hwijeen Ahn, Juhan Bae, Kewen Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 112 citations
- DataInf: Efficiently Estimating Data Influence in LoRA-tuned LLMs and Diffusion ModelsYongchan Kwon, Eric Wu, Kevin Wu, James ZouICLR 2024 · 112 citations
- De-attribute to Forget for LLM UnlearningXinyang Lu, Jiabao Pan, Rachael Hwee Ling Sim, See-Kiong Ng et al.ICML 2026
