RepMatch: Quantifying Cross-Instance Similarities in Representation Space
Mohammad Modarres, Sina Abbasi, Mohammad Taher Pilehvar
Abstract
Advances in dataset analysis techniques have enabled more sophisticated approaches to analyzing and characterizing training data instances, often categorizing data based on attributes such as "difficulty". In this work, we introduce RepMatch, a novel method that characterizes data through the lens of similarity. RepMatch quantifies the similarity between subsets of training instances by comparing the knowledge encoded in models trained on them, overcoming the limitations of existing analysis methods that focus solely on individual instances and are restricted to within-dataset analysis. Our framework allows for a broader evaluation, enabling similarity comparisons across arbitrary subsets of instances, supporting both dataset-to-dataset and instance-to-dataset analyses. We validate the effectiveness of Rep-Match across multiple NLP tasks, datasets, and models. Through extensive experimentation, we demonstrate that RepMatch can effectively compare datasets, identify more representative subsets of a dataset (that lead to better performance than randomly selected subsets of equivalent size), and uncover heuristics underlying the construction of some challenge datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ba6a488e-de19-4cd8-9bd0-a3d898fcefb3Builds on13
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- ELECTRA: Pre-training Text Encoders as Discriminators Rather Than GeneratorsKevin Clark, Minh-Thang Luong, Quoc V. Le, Christopher D. ManningICLR 2020 · 541 citations
- Coresets for Data-efficient Training of Machine Learning ModelsBaharan Mirzasoleiman, Jeff A. Bilmes, Jure LeskovecICML 2020 · 494 citations
- LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction TuningMengzhou Xia, Sadhika Malladi, Suchin Gururangan, Sanjeev Arora et al.ICML 2024 · 460 citations
- Identifying Mislabeled Data using the Area Under the Margin RankingGeoff Pleiss, Tianyi Zhang, Ethan R. Elenberg, Kilian Q. WeinbergerNeurIPS 2020 · 398 citations
Related papers
- Narrowing the Gap between Supervised and Unsupervised Sentence Representation Learning with Large Language ModelMingxin Li, Richong Zhang, Zhijie Nie, Yongyi MaoAAAI 2024 · 1 citation
- ReSi: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Representational Similarity MeasuresMax Klabunde, Tassilo Wald, Tobias Schumacher, Klaus H. Maier-Hein et al.ICLR 2025
- A Critical Re-evaluation of Record Linkage Benchmarks for Learning-Based Matching AlgorithmsGeorge Papadakis, Nishadi Kirielle, Peter Christen, Themis PalpanasICDE 2024 · 8 citations
- Comparing Text Representations: A Theory-Driven ApproachGregory Yauney, David MimnoEMNLP 2021
- DsDm: Model-Aware Dataset Selection with DatamodelsLogan Engstrom, Axel Feldmann, Aleksander MadryICML 2024 · 105 citations
