MIRAGE: Misleading Retrieval-Augmented Generation via Black-box and Query-agnostic Poisoning Attacks
Tailun Chen, Yu He, Yan Wang, Shuo Shao, Haolun Zheng, Zhihao Liu, Jinfeng Li, Zhizhen Qin, Yuefeng Chen, Zhixuan Chu, Zhan Qin, Kui Ren
Abstract
Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems enhance LLMs with external knowledge but introduce a critical attack surface: corpus poisoning. While recent studies have demonstrated the potential of such attacks, they typically rely on impractical assumptions, such as white-box access or known user queries, thereby underestimating the difficulty of real-world exploitation. In this paper, we bridge this gap by proposing MIRAGE, a novel multi-stage poisoning pipeline designed for strict black-box and query-agnostic environments. Operating on surrogate model feedback, MIRAGE functions as an automated optimization framework that integrates three key mechanisms: it utilizes persona-driven query synthesis to approximate latent user search distributions, employs semantic anchoring to imperceptibly embed these intents for high retrieval visibility, and leverages an adversarial variant of Test-Time Preference Optimization (TPO) to maximize persuasion. To rigorously evaluate this threat, we construct a new benchmark derived from three long-form, domain-specific datasets. Extensive experiments demonstrate that MIRAGE significantly outperforms existing baselines in both attack efficacy and stealthiness, exhibiting remarkable transferability across diverse retriever-LLM configurations and highlighting the urgent need for robust defense strategies. 1 CCS Concepts • Security and privacy; • Computing methodologies → Machine learning;
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ba1610b9-234a-4755-8812-eaa93c549b3fCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Deberta: decoding-Enhanced Bert with Disentangled AttentionPengcheng He, Xiaodong Liu, Jianfeng Gao, Weizhu ChenICLR 2021 · 3,729 citations
- AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge BasesZhaorun Chen, Zhen Xiang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawn Song et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 539 citations
- Formalizing and Benchmarking Prompt Injection Attacks and DefensesYupei Liu, Yuqi Jia, Runpeng Geng, Jinyuan Jia et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 308 citations
- Chameleon: a Heterogeneous and Disaggregated Accelerator System for Retrieval-Augmented Language ModelsWenqi Jiang, Marco Zeller, Roger Waleffe, Torsten Hoefler et al.VLDB 2025 · 50 citations
Related papers
- PR-Attack: Coordinated Prompt-RAG Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation in Large Language Models via Bilevel OptimizationYang Jiao, Xiaodong Wang, Kai YangSIGIR 2025 · 6 citations
- Reranker Helps, but Not Enough: Towards Strong Poisoning Attacks Against Retrieval-Augmented GenerationXiaokun Yang, Jian Liang, Yesheng Liu, Xin Xiong et al.ICML 2026
- Joint-GCG: Unified Gradient-Based Poisoning Attacks on Retrieval-Augmented Generation SystemsHaowei Wang, Rupeng Zhang, Junjie Wang, Mingyang Li et al.AAAI 2026 · 3 citations
- On the Vulnerability of Applying Retrieval-Augmented Generation within Knowledge-Intensive Application DomainsXun Xian, Ganghua Wang, Xuan Bi, Rui Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- FlippedRAG: Black-Box Opinion Manipulation Adversarial Attacks to Retrieval-Augmented Generation ModelsZhuo Chen, Yuyang Gong, Jiawei Liu, Miaokun Chen et al.CCS 2025
