On the Expressivity and Sample Complexity of Node-Individualized Graph Neural Networks
Paolo Pellizzoni, Till Hendrik Schulz, Dexiong Chen, Karsten M. Borgwardt
Abstract
Graph neural networks (GNNs) employing message passing for graph classification are inherently limited by the expressive power of the Weisfeiler-Leman (WL) test for graph isomorphism. Node individualization schemes, which assign unique identifiers to nodes (e.g., by adding random noise to features), are a common approach for achieving universal expressiveness. However, the ability of GNNs endowed with individualization schemes to generalize beyond the training data is still an open question. To address this question, this paper presents a theoretical analysis of the sample complexity of such GNNs from a statistical learning perspective, employing Vapnik–Chervonenkis (VC) dimension and covering number bounds. We demonstrate that node individualization schemes that are permutation-equivariant result in lower sample complexity, and design novel individualization schemes that exploit these results. As an application of this analysis, we also develop a novel architecture that can perform substructure identification (i.e., subgraph isomorphism) while having a lower VC dimension compared to competing methods. Finally, our theoretical findings are validated experimentally on both synthetic and real-world datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext ba08e04e-dc7b-42b4-9332-a3b38f687253Cited by top-tier papers9
- Logical Expressiveness of Graph Neural Networks with Hierarchical Node IndividualizationArie Soeteman, Balder ten CateNeurIPS 2025 · 3 citations
- How Wide and How Deep? Mitigating Over-squashing of GNNs via Channel Capacity Constrained EstimationZinuo You, Jin Zheng, John CartlidgeAAAI 2026 · 1 citation
- On The Expressive Power of GNN DerivativesYam Eitan, Moshe Eliasof, Yoav Gelberg, Fabrizio Frasca et al.ICLR 2026 · 1 citation
- Graph Neural Networks Can (Often) Count SubstructuresPaolo Pellizzoni, Till Hendrik Schulz, Karsten M. BorgwardtICLR 2025
- Minimax Sample Complexity of Graph Neural Networks: Lower Bounds and Structural EffectsAhmad Ghasemi, Hossein Pishro-NikICLR 2026
Builds on24
- E(n) Equivariant Graph Neural NetworksVictor Garcia Satorras, Emiel Hoogeboom, Max WellingICML 2021 · 1,432 citations
- Graph Neural Networks Exponentially Lose Expressive Power for Node ClassificationKenta Oono, Taiji SuzukiICLR 2020 · 864 citations
- Graph Neural Networks with Learnable Structural and Positional RepresentationsVijay Prakash Dwivedi, Anh Tuan Luu, Thomas Laurent, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICLR 2022 · 464 citations
- Can Graph Neural Networks Count Substructures?Zhengdao Chen, Lei Chen, Soledad Villar, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2020 · 392 citations
- Generalization and Representational Limits of Graph Neural NetworksVikas K. Garg, Stefanie Jegelka, Tommi S. JaakkolaICML 2020 · 363 citations
Related papers
- WL meet VCChristopher Morris, Floris Geerts, Jan Tönshoff, Martin GroheICML 2023 · 36 citations
- Equivariant Subgraph Aggregation NetworksBeatrice Bevilacqua, Fabrizio Frasca, Derek Lim, Balasubramaniam Srinivasan et al.ICLR 2022 · 217 citations
- 𝒩-WL: A New Hierarchy of Expressivity for Graph Neural NetworksQing Wang, Dillon Ze Chen, Asiri Wijesinghe, Shouheng Li et al.ICLR 2023
- Identity-aware Graph Neural NetworksJiaxuan You, Jonathan Michael Gomes Selman, Rex Ying, Jure LeskovecAAAI 2021 · 316 citations
- On the Universality of Graph Neural Networks on Large Random GraphsNicolas Keriven, Alberto Bietti, Samuel VaiterNeurIPS 2021 · 29 citations
