Softsign: Smooth Sign in Your Optimizer For Better Parameter Heterogeneity Handling
Dmitrii Feoktistov, Timofey Belinsky, Andrey Veprikov, Amir Zainullin, Aleksandr Beznosikov
Abstract
Sign-based and LMO-inspired optimizers have recently attracted substantial attention in deep learning due to their strong performance and low memory footprint. However, their fixed-magnitude updates can hurt terminal convergence: they decouple update mechanisms from gradient magnitudes and fail to account for parameter heterogeneity, often leading to oscillation rather than convergence. We propose SoftSignum, a smooth relaxation of sign-based optimization that replaces the hard sign map with a temperature-controlled soft-sign transformation, enabling a parameter-wise transition from sign-like updates to magnitude-sensitive SGD-like steps. We complement it with an adaptive quantile-based temperature schedule and extend the same principle to matrix-valued optimizers, obtaining SoftMuon. We also develop a generalized geometry-relaxation framework based on strongly convex regularizers and Fenchel conjugates, proving convergence in stochastic non-convex setting. Experiments on diverse deep learning tasks, including LLM pretraining, show that SoftSignum and SoftMuon consistently improve over their hard sign-based counterparts and standard AdamW. Recent work argues that the gradient-magnitude factor ∥g k ∥ * in (2) is not essential for deep learning and can be dropped (Bernstein & Newhouse, 2024; Pethick et al., 2025) . What remains is a pure Linear Minimization Oracle (LMO) step: Choosing ∥ • ∥ as the ℓ ∞ norm reduces (3) to a coordinatewise sign step and recovers normSGD (
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b94b273e-0a3d-4bba-8422-5790bac81475Builds on10
- Symbolic Discovery of Optimization AlgorithmsXiangning Chen, Chen Liang, Da Huang, Esteban Real et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 734 citations
- Why are Adaptive Methods Good for Attention Models?Jingzhao Zhang, Sai Praneeth Karimireddy, Andreas Veit, Seungyeon Kim et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 397 citations
- The Polar Express: Optimal Matrix Sign Methods and their Application to the Muon AlgorithmNoah Amsel, David Persson, Christopher Musco, Robert M. GowerICLR 2026 · 115 citations
- Fantastic Pretraining Optimizers and Where to Find ThemKaiyue Wen, David Leo Wright Hall, Tengyu Ma, Percy LiangICLR 2026 · 92 citations
- Analyzing Sharpness along GD Trajectory: Progressive Sharpening and Edge of StabilityZixuan Wang, Zhouzi Li, Jian LiNeurIPS 2022 · 71 citations
Related papers
- Enhancing LLM Training via Spectral ClippingXiaowen Jiang, Andrei Semenov, Sebastian StichICML 2026 · 4 citations
- OLion: Approaching the Hadamard Ideal by Intersecting Spectral and L inf Implicit BiasesZixiao Wang, Yifei Shen, Huishuai ZhangICML 2026
- From Muon to Gluon: Bridging Theory and Practice of LMO-based Optimizers for LLMsArtem Riabinin, Egor Shulgin, Kaja Gruntkowska, Peter RichtarikICML 2026
- Muon in Associative Memory Learning: Training Dynamics and Scaling LawsKaifei Wang, Binghui Li, Han Zhong, Pinyan Lu et al.ICML 2026 · 7 citations
- MGUP: A Momentum-Gradient Alignment Update Policy for Stochastic OptimizationDa Chang, Ganzhao YuanNeurIPS 2025 · 9 citations
