Positional Attention: Expressivity and Learnability of Algorithmic Computation
Artur Back de Luca, George Giapitzakis, Shenghao Yang, Petar Velickovic, Kimon Fountoulakis
Abstract
There is a growing interest in the ability of neural networks to execute algorithmic tasks (e.g., arithmetic, summary statistics, and sorting). The goal of this work is to better understand the role of attention in Transformers for algorithmic execution. Its importance for algorithmic execution has been studied theoretically and empirically using parallel computational models. Notably, many parallel algorithms communicate between processors solely using positional information. Inspired by this observation, we investigate how Transformers can execute algorithms using positional attention, where attention weights depend exclusively on positional encodings. We prove that Transformers with positional attention (positional Transformers) maintain the same expressivity of parallel computational models, incurring a logarithmic depth cost relative to the input length. We analyze their in-distribution learnability and explore how parameter norms in positional attention affect sample complexity. Our results show that positional Transformers introduce a learning trade-off: while they exhibit better theoretical dependence on parameter norms, certain tasks may require more layers, which can, in turn, increase sample complexity. Finally, we empirically explore the out-of-distribution performance of positional Transformers and find that they perform well in tasks where their underlying algorithmic solution relies on positional information.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b9221c84-51c6-4e04-a94b-106a0171e2c9Cited by top-tier papers5
- Tropical Attention: Neural Algorithmic Reasoning for Combinatorial AlgorithmsBaran Hashemi, Kurt Pasque, Christopher Teska, Ruriko YoshidaNeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- A Capacity-Based Rationale for Multi-Head AttentionMicah AdlerICML 2026 · 2 citations
- Rethinking Addressing in Language Models via Contextualized Equivariant Positional EncodingJiajun Zhu, Peihao Wang, Ruisi Cai, Jason D. Lee et al.ICML 2025
- Learning to Execute Graph Algorithms Exactly with Graph Neural NetworksMuhammad Fetrat Qharabagh, Artur Back de Luca, George Giapitzakis, Kimon FountoulakisICML 2026
- Which Algorithms Can Graph Neural Networks Learn?Solveig Wittig, Antonis Vasileiou, Robert R. Nerem, Timo Stoll et al.ICML 2026
Builds on27
- The Impact of Positional Encoding on Length Generalization in TransformersAmirhossein Kazemnejad, Inkit Padhi, Karthikeyan Natesan Ramamurthy, Payel Das et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 444 citations
- Sparse Sinkhorn AttentionYi Tay, Dara Bahri, Liu Yang, Donald Metzler et al.ICML 2020 · 391 citations
- What graph neural networks cannot learn: depth vs widthAndreas LoukasICLR 2020 · 336 citations
- What Can Neural Networks Reason About?Keyulu Xu, Jingling Li, Mozhi Zhang, Simon S. Du et al.ICLR 2020 · 281 citations
- Neural Execution of Graph AlgorithmsPetar Velickovic, Rex Ying, Matilde Padovano, Raia Hadsell et al.ICLR 2020 · 192 citations
Related papers
- Transformers, parallel computation, and logarithmic depthClayton Sanford, Daniel Hsu, Matus TelgarskyICML 2024 · 64 citations
- Are Transformers universal approximators of sequence-to-sequence functions?Chulhee Yun, Srinadh Bhojanapalli, Ankit Singh Rawat, Sashank J. Reddi et al.ICLR 2020 · 481 citations
- Looped Transformers as Programmable ComputersAngeliki Giannou, Shashank Rajput, Jy-yong Sohn, Kangwook Lee et al.ICML 2023 · 175 citations
- On Expressive Power of Floating-Point TransformersSejun Park, Yeachan Park, Geonho HwangICML 2026 · 2 citations
- From Shortcut to Induction Head: How Data Diversity Shapes Algorithm Selection in TransformersRyotaro Kawata, Yujin Song, Alberto Bietti, Naoki Nishikawa et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
