How to Strategize Human Content Creation in the Era of GenAI?
Seyed A. Esmaeili, Kevin Lim, Kshipra Bhawalkar, Zhe Feng, Di Wang, Haifeng Xu
Abstract
Generative AI (GenAI) will have significant impact on content creation platforms. In this paper, we study the dynamic competition between a GenAI and a human contributor. Unlike the human, the GenAI's content only improves when more contents are created by the human over time; however, GenAI has the advantage of generating content at a lower cost. We study the algorithmic problem in this dynamic competition model about how the human contributor can maximize her utility when competing against the GenAI for content generation over a set of topics. In time-sensitive content domains (e.g., news or pop music creation) where contents' value diminishes over time, we show that there is no polynomial time algorithm for finding the human's optimal (dynamic) strategy, unless the randomized exponential time hypothesis is false. Fortunately, we are able to design a polynomial time algorithm that naturally cycles between myopically optimizing over a short time window and pausing and provably guarantees an approximation ratio of 1/2 . We then turn to time-insensitive content domains where contents do not lose their value (e.g., contents on history facts). Interestingly, we show that this setting permits a polynomial time algorithm that maximizes the human's utility in the long run. Finally, we conduct simulations that demonstrate the advantage of our algorithms in comparison to a collection of baselines.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8fcf641-1564-42aa-a84a-82c3986ee848Cited by top-tier papers2
- Strategic Content Creation with GenAI: To Share or Not to Share?Gur Keinan, Omer Ben-PoratWWW 2026 · 5 citations
- Braess's Paradox of Generative AIBoaz Taitler, Omer Ben-PoratAAAI 2025 · 2 citations
Builds on10
- Retrieval-Augmented Generation for Knowledge-Intensive NLP TasksPatrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 19,162 citations
- Photorealistic Text-to-Image Diffusion Models with Deep Language UnderstandingChitwan Saharia, William Chan, Saurabh Saxena, Lala Li et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 8,965 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- Optimizing Long-term Social Welfare in Recommender Systems: A Constrained Matching ApproachMartin Mladenov, Elliot Creager, Omer Ben-Porat, Kevin Swersky et al.ICML 2020 · 70 citations
- Supply-Side Equilibria in Recommender SystemsMeena Jagadeesan, Nikhil Garg, Jacob SteinhardtNeurIPS 2023 · 53 citations
Related papers
- Human vs. Generative AI in Content Creation Competition: Symbiosis or Conflict?Fan Yao, Chuanhao Li, Denis Nekipelov, Hongning Wang et al.ICML 2024 · 31 citations
- Selective Response Strategies for GenAIBoaz Taitler, Omer Ben-PoratICML 2025
- AI as Social Glue: Uncovering the Roles of Deep Generative AI during Social Music CompositionMinhyang (Mia) Suh, Emily Youngblom, Michael Terry, Carrie J. CaiCHI 2021 · 132 citations
- Comparing the Willingness to Share for Human-generated vs. AI-generated Fake NewsAmirsiavosh Bashardoust, Stefan Feuerriegel, Yash Raj ShresthaCSCW 2024 · 28 citations
- Information Retrieval in the Age of Generative AI: The RGB ModelMichele Garetto, Alessandro Cornacchia, Franco Galante, Emilio Leonardi et al.SIGIR 2025 · 2 citations
