Filtered Direct Preference Optimization
Tetsuro Morimura, Mitsuki Sakamoto, Yuu Jinnai, Kenshi Abe, Kaito Ariu
Abstract
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) plays a crucial role in aligning language models with human preferences. While the significance of dataset quality is generally recognized, explicit investigations into its impact within the RLHF framework, to our knowledge, have been limited. This paper addresses the issue of text quality within the preference dataset by focusing on direct preference optimization (DPO), an increasingly adopted reward-model-free RLHF method. We confirm that text quality significantly influences the performance of models optimized with DPO more than those optimized with reward-modelbased RLHF. Building on this new insight, we propose an extension of DPO, termed filtered direct preference optimization (fDPO). fDPO uses a trained reward model to monitor the quality of texts within the preference dataset during DPO training. Samples of lower quality are discarded based on comparisons with texts generated by the model being optimized, resulting in a more accurate dataset. Experimental results demonstrate that fDPO enhances the final model performance. Our code is available at https://github.com/CyberAgentAILab/ filtered-dpo .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8f4bdb0-ae17-42cc-bbee-a037a7761b03Cited by top-tier papers13
- β-DPO: Direct Preference Optimization with Dynamic βJunkang Wu, Yuexiang Xie, Zhengyi Yang, Jiancan Wu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 114 citations
- Geometric-Averaged Preference Optimization for Soft Preference LabelsHiroki Furuta, Kuang-Huei Lee, Shixiang Shane Gu, Yutaka Matsuo et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 24 citations
- What Matters in Data for DPO?Yu Pan, Zhongze Cai, Huaiyang Zhong, Guanting Chen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 13 citations
- Towards Understanding Valuable Preference Data for Large Language Model AlignmentZizhuo Zhang, Qizhou Wang, Shanshan Ye, Jianing Zhu et al.ICLR 2026 · 6 citations
- ViPO: Visual Preference Optimization at ScaleMing Li, Jie Wu, Jiaxing Cui, Xiaojie Li et al.ICLR 2026 · 2 citations
Builds on6
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Direct Preference Optimization: Your Language Model is Secretly a Reward ModelRafael Rafailov, Archit Sharma, Eric Mitchell, Christopher D. Manning et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 10,924 citations
- TruthfulQA: Measuring How Models Mimic Human FalsehoodsStephanie Lin, Jacob Hilton, Owain EvansACL 2022 · 3,228 citations
- Pythia: A Suite for Analyzing Large Language Models Across Training and ScalingStella Biderman, Hailey Schoelkopf, Quentin Gregory Anthony, Herbie Bradley et al.ICML 2023 · 1,822 citations
- Self-Rewarding Language ModelsWeizhe Yuan, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Kyunghyun Cho, Xian Li et al.ICML 2024 · 569 citations
Related papers
- Uni-DPO: A Unified Paradigm for Dynamic Preference Optimization of LLMsShangpin Peng, Weinong Wang, Zhuotao Tian, Senqiao Yang et al.ICLR 2026 · 10 citations
- Using Human Feedback to Fine-tune Diffusion Models without Any Reward ModelKai Yang, Jian Tao, Jiafei Lyu, Chunjiang Ge et al.CVPR 2024 · 34 citations
- Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive StudyShusheng Xu, Wei Fu, Jiaxuan Gao, Wenjie Ye et al.ICML 2024 · 274 citations
- Explicit Preference Optimization: No Need for an Implicit Reward ModelXiangkun Hu, Lemin Kong, Tong He, David WipfICML 2025
- Pre-DPO: Improving Data Utilization in Direct Preference Optimization Using a Guiding Reference ModelJunshu Pan, Wei Shen, Shulin Huang, Qiji Zhou et al.AAAI 2026 · 7 citations
