Machine-generated text detection prevents language model collapse
George Drayson, Emine Yilmaz, Vasileios Lampos
Abstract
As Large Language Models (LLMs) become increasingly prevalent, their generated outputs are proliferating across the web, risking a future where machine-generated content dilutes human-authored text. Since online data is the primary resource for LLM pre-training, subsequent models could be trained on an unknown portion of synthetic samples. This could lead to model collapse, a degenerative process whereby LLMs reinforce their own errors, reduce output diversity, and ultimately yield declining performance. In this study, we investigate the impact of decoding strategy on model collapse, analysing the text characteristics at each model generation, the similarity to human references, and the resulting model performance. Using the decoding strategies that lead to the most significant degradation, we evaluate model collapse in a more realistic scenario where the origin of the data (human or synthetic) is unknown. We train a machinegenerated text detector and propose an importance resampling approach to prevent model collapse by up-sampling likely human content in the training data. Our method is validated on four LLMs from two model families (GPT-2 and SmolLM2), across a range of model sizes (124M to 1.7B). We demonstrate that it not only prevents model collapse but also improves performance compared to training on purely human data, underscoring the benefit of synthetic samples and the importance of data curation. 1
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- What happens when generative AI models train recursively on each others' outputs?Hung Anh Vu, Galen Reeves, Emily WengerICLR 2026 · 4 citations
- Stabilizing Self-Consuming Diffusion Models with Latent Space FilteringZhongteng Cai, Yaxuan Wang, Yang Liu, Xueru ZhangAAAI 2026 · 2 citations
- On the Salience of Low-Probability Tokens for AI-Generated Text Detection: A Multiscale Uncertainty PerspectiveYikai Guo, Bin Wang, Xilai Fan, Wenjun Ke et al.ICML 2026
Builds on16
- The Curious Case of Neural Text DegenerationAri Holtzman, Jan Buys, Li Du, Maxwell Forbes et al.ICLR 2020 · 4,112 citations
- DetectGPT: Zero-Shot Machine-Generated Text Detection using Probability CurvatureEric Mitchell, Yoonho Lee, Alexander Khazatsky, Christopher D. Manning et al.ICML 2023 · 988 citations
- MAUVE: Measuring the Gap Between Neural Text and Human Text using Divergence FrontiersKrishna Pillutla, Swabha Swayamdipta, Rowan Zellers, John Thickstun et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 606 citations
- Smarter, Better, Faster, Longer: A Modern Bidirectional Encoder for Fast, Memory Efficient, and Long Context Finetuning and InferenceBenjamin Warner, Antoine Chaffin, Benjamin Clavié, Orion Weller et al.ACL 2025 · 552 citations
- Self-Instruct: Aligning Language Models with Self-Generated InstructionsYizhong Wang, Yeganeh Kordi, Swaroop Mishra, Alisa Liu et al.ACL 2023 · 540 citations
Related papers
- Demystifying Synthetic Data in LLM Pre-training: A Systematic Study of Scaling Laws, Benefits, and PitfallsFeiyang Kang, Newsha Ardalani, Michael Kuchnik, Youssef Emad et al.EMNLP 2025
- Language Generation with Replay: A Learning-Theoretic View of Model CollapseGiorgio Racca, Michal Valko, Amartya SanyalICML 2026 · 4 citations
- How to Synthesize Text Data without Model Collapse?Xuekai Zhu, Daixuan Cheng, Hengli Li, Kaiyan Zhang et al.ICML 2025
- A Tale of Tails: Model Collapse as a Change of Scaling LawsElvis Dohmatob, Yunzhen Feng, Pu Yang, François Charton et al.ICML 2024 · 123 citations
- Beyond Model Collapse: Scaling Up with Synthesized Data Requires VerificationYunzhen Feng, Elvis Dohmatob, Pu Yang, François Charton et al.ICLR 2025 · 6 citations
