The Snowflake Hypothesis: Training and Powering GNN with One Node One Receptive Field
Kun Wang, Guohao Li, Shilong Wang, Guibin Zhang, Kai Wang, Yang You, Junfeng Fang, Xiaojiang Peng, Yuxuan Liang, Yang Wang
Abstract
Despite Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) demonstrating considerable promise in graph representation learning tasks, GNNs predominantly face significant issues with overfitting and over-smoothing as they go deeper as models of computer vision (CV) realm. The success of artificial intelligence in computer vision and natural language processing largely stems from its ability to train deep models effectively. We have thus conducted a systematic study on deep GNN models. Our findings indicate that the current success of deep GNNs primarily stems from (I) the adoption of innovations from CNNs, such as residual/skip connections, or (II) the tailor-made aggregation algorithms like DropEdge. However, these algorithms often lack intrinsic interpretability and indiscriminately treat all nodes within a given layer in a similar manner, thereby failing to capture the nuanced differences among various nodes. In this paper, we introduce the Snowflake Hypothesis -- a novel paradigm underpinning the concept of "one node, one receptive field''. The hypothesis draws inspiration from the unique and individualistic patterns of each snowflake, proposing a corresponding uniqueness in the receptive fields of nodes in the GNNs. We employ the simplest gradient and node-level cosine distance as guiding principles to regulate the aggregation depth for each node, and conduct comprehensive experiments including: (1) different training scheme; (2) various shallow and deep GNN backbones; (3) various numbers of layers (8, 16, 32, 64) on multiple benchmarks; (4) compare with different aggregation strategies. The observational results demonstrate that our framework can serve as a universal operator for a range of tasks, and it displays tremendous potential on deep GNNs. Code is available at: https://github.com/CunWang520/Snowhypothe.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers4
- IceBerg: Debiased Self-Training for Class-Imbalanced Node ClassificationZhixun Li, Dingshuo Chen, Tong Zhao, Daixin Wang et al.WWW 2025 · 7 citations
- TimeFilter: Patch-Specific Spatial-Temporal Graph Filtration for Time Series ForecastingYifan Hu, Guibin Zhang, Peiyuan Liu, Disen Lan et al.ICML 2025
- Rationalizing and Augmenting Dynamic Graph Neural NetworksGuibin Zhang, Yiyan Qi, Ziyang Cheng, Yanwei Yue et al.ICLR 2025
- Let Your Features Tell The Differences: Understanding Graph Convolution By Feature SplittingYilun Zheng, Xiang Li, Sitao Luan, Xiaojiang Peng et al.ICLR 2025
Related papers
- The Heterophilic Snowflake Hypothesis: Training and Empowering GNNs for Heterophilic GraphsKun Wang, Guibin Zhang, Xinnan Zhang, Junfeng Fang et al.KDD 2024 · 6 citations
- Neural Snowflakes: Universal Latent Graph Inference via Trainable Latent GeometriesHaitz Sáez de Ocáriz Borde, Anastasis KratsiosICLR 2024 · 6 citations
- Snowflake: Scaling GNNs to high-dimensional continuous control via parameter freezingCharlie Blake, Vitaly Kurin, Maximilian Igl, Shimon WhitesonNeurIPS 2021 · 18 citations
- Feature Overcorrelation in Deep Graph Neural Networks: A New PerspectiveWei Jin, Xiaorui Liu, Yao Ma, Charu C. Aggarwal et al.KDD 2022 · 28 citations
- Dirichlet Energy Constrained Learning for Deep Graph Neural NetworksKaixiong Zhou, Xiao Huang, Daochen Zha, Rui Chen et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 171 citations
