The Open Proof Corpus: A Large-Scale Study of LLM-Generated Mathematical Proofs
Jasper Dekoninck, Ivo Petrov, Kristian Minchev, Miroslav Marinov, Maria Drencheva, Lyuba Konova, Milen Shumanov, Kaloyan Tsvetkov, Nikolay Drenchev, Lazar Todorov, Kalina Nikolova, Nikolay Georgiev
Abstract
In recent months, large language models (LLMs) have made significant progress in mathematical proof generation, but further advancement is hindered by the lack of a large-scale, high-quality dataset of human-evaluated proofs. While expensive to create, such a dataset is essential for driving improvements in training and addressing key open questions in the field of automated proof generation. Specifically, it remains unknown (1) how large the gap is between natural language and formal proof generation, (2) how final-answer accuracy relates to full proof correctness, and (3) how best-of-n selection strategies can affect proof quality. In this work, we present the Open Proof Corpus (OPC), a dataset comprising over 5,000 human-evaluated proofs produced by state-of-the-art LLMs. The OPC was specifically designed for broad applicability and downstream usage in proof generation research and is the first large dataset of LLM-generated solutions to problems from prestigious mathematics competitions such as the USAMO and IMO. Using the OPC, we address the open questions outlined above and provide new insights into LLMs' strengths and limitations in mathematical reasoning. Finally, to showcase the utility of the OPC, we finetune an 8B-parameter model on the dataset, obtaining a model that matches Gemini-2.5-Pro, and performs close to the best model, GPT-5, on evaluating proof correctness.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b8276c1f-c5ca-4f9f-a107-d121f90fd3d0Cited by top-tier papers8
- Hilbert: Recursively Building Formal Proofs with Informal ReasoningSumanth Varambally, Thomas Voice, Yanchao Sun, Zhifeng Chen et al.ICLR 2026 · 62 citations
- BrokenMath: A Benchmark for Sycophancy in Theorem Proving with LLMsIvo Petrov, Jasper Dekoninck, Martin VechevICML 2026 · 25 citations
- Mathematical Proof as a Litmus Test: Revealing Failure Modes of Advanced Large Reasoning ModelsDadi Guo, Jiayu Liu, Zhiyuan Fan, Zhitao He et al.ACL 2026 · 17 citations
- Reliable Fine-Grained Evaluation of Natural Language Math ProofsWenjie Ma, Andrei Cojocaru, Neel Kolhe, Haihan Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 14 citations
- Scaling Generative Verifiers For Natural Language Mathematical Proof Verification And SelectionSadegh Mahdavi, Branislav Kisacanin, Shubham Toshniwal, Wei Du et al.ICML 2026 · 10 citations
Builds on12
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- LLM Evaluators Recognize and Favor Their Own GenerationsArjun Panickssery, Samuel R. Bowman, Shi FengNeurIPS 2024 · 865 citations
- The Illusion of Thinking: Understanding the Strengths and Limitations of Reasoning Models via the Lens of Problem ComplexityParshin Shojaee, Iman Mirzadeh, Keivan Alizadeh-Vahid, Maxwell Horton et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 507 citations
- miniF2F: a cross-system benchmark for formal Olympiad-level mathematicsKunhao Zheng, Jesse Michael Han, Stanislas PoluICLR 2022 · 342 citations
- DeepMath-103K: A Large-Scale, Challenging, Decontaminated, and Verifiable Mathematical Dataset for Advancing ReasoningZhiwei He, Tian Liang, Jiahao Xu, Qiuzhi Liu et al.ICLR 2026 · 271 citations
Related papers
- Large Language Model for OWL ProofsHui Yang, Jiaoyan Chen, Uli SattlerWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- QEDBench: Quantifying the Alignment Gap in Automated Evaluation of University-Level Mathematical ProofsSantiago Gonzalez, Alireza Amiribavandpour, Peter Ye, Edward Zhang et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Towards Robust Mathematical ReasoningThang Luong, Dawsen Hwang, Hoang H. Nguyen, Golnaz Ghiasi et al.EMNLP 2025
- NaturalProver: Grounded Mathematical Proof Generation with Language ModelsSean Welleck, Jiacheng Liu, Ximing Lu, Hannaneh Hajishirzi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 108 citations
- Language Models Are Greedy Reasoners: A Systematic Formal Analysis of Chain-of-ThoughtAbulhair Saparov, He HeICLR 2023 · 38 citations
