Proxy Indicators for the Quality of Open-domain Dialogues
Rostislav Nedelchev, Jens Lehmann, Ricardo Usbeck
Abstract
The automatic evaluation of open-domain dialogues remains a largely unsolved challenge. Thus, despite the abundance of work done in the field, human judges have to evaluate dialogues' quality. As a consequence, performing such evaluations at scale is usually expensive. This work investigates using a deep-learning model trained on the General Language Understanding Evaluation (GLUE) benchmark to serve as a quality indication of open-domain dialogues. The aim is to use the various GLUE tasks as different perspectives on judging the quality of conversation, thus reducing the need for additional training data or responses that serve as quality references. Due to this nature, the method can infer various quality metrics and derive a component-based overall score. We achieve statistically significant correlation coefficients of up to 0.7.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on1
Related papers
- LexGLUE: A Benchmark Dataset for Legal Language Understanding in EnglishIlias Chalkidis, Abhik Jana, Dirk Hartung, Michael J. Bommarito II et al.ACL 2022
- Towards Holistic and Automatic Evaluation of Open-Domain Dialogue GenerationBo Pang, Erik Nijkamp, Wenjuan Han, Linqi Zhou et al.ACL 2020 · 69 citations
- Don't Forget Your ABC's: Evaluating the State-of-the-Art in Chat-Oriented Dialogue SystemsSarah E. Finch, James D. Finch, Jinho D. ChoiACL 2023 · 10 citations
- Multi-Source Probing for Open-Domain Conversational UnderstandingYuanxi Li, Hao Zhou, Jie Zhou, Minlie HuangEMNLP 2023
- FineD-Eval: Fine-grained Automatic Dialogue-Level EvaluationChen Zhang, Luis Fernando D'Haro, Qiquan Zhang, Thomas Friedrichs et al.EMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
