Growlithe: A Developer-Centric Compliance Tool for Serverless Applications
Praveen Gupta, Arshia Moghimi, Devam Sisodraker, Mohammad Shahrad, Aastha Mehta
Abstract
Serverless applications consist of functions written in heterogeneous programming languages, use diverse data stores and communication services, and evolve rapidly. Consequently, it is challenging for serverless tenants to protect their application data from inadvertent leaks due to bugs, misconfigurations, and human errors. Cloud security tools, such as Identity and Access Management (IAM), lack observability into a tenant's application, whereas the state-of-the-art dataflow tracking tools require support from the cloud platform and incur significant runtime overheads. We present Growlithe, a tool that integrates with the serverless application development toolchain and enables continuous compliance with data policies by design. Growlithe allows declarative specification of access and data flow control policies over a language- and platform-independent dataflow graph abstraction of a serverless application, and enforces these policies through a combination of static analysis and runtime enforcement. We used Growlithe with applications using Python and JavaScript functions that can be hosted on AWS Lambda and Google Cloud Functions platforms. We empirically demonstrate that Growlithe is cross-cutting, portable and efficient, and enables developers to easily adapt their application and policies to evolving requirements.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b7d7e66e-c994-4d84-99dd-82371ecb10dcCited by top-tier papers3
- Paralegal: Practical Static Analysis for Privacy BugsJustus Adam, Carolyn Zech, Livia Zhu, Sreshtaa Rajesh et al.OSDI 2025 · 2 citations
- ALPS: Automated Least-Privilege Enforcement for Securing Serverless FunctionsChanghee Shin, Bom Kim, Seungsoo LeeINFOCOM 2026 · 1 citation
- Skyler: Static Analysis for Predicting API-Driven Costs in Serverless ApplicationsBernardo Ribeiro, Mafalda Ferreira, José Fragoso Santos, Rodrigo Bruno et al.ASPLOS 2026
Builds on12
- Serverless in the Wild: Characterizing and Optimizing the Serverless Workload at a Large Cloud ProviderMohammad Shahrad, Rodrigo Fonseca, Iñigo Goiri, Gohar Irfan Chaudhry et al.USENIX ATC 2020 · 946 citations
- Valve: Securing Function Workflows on Serverless Computing PlatformsPubali Datta, Prabuddha Kumar, Tristan Morris, Michael Grace et al.WWW 2020 · 79 citations
- Automatic Policy Generation for Inter-Service Access Control of MicroservicesXing Li, Yan Chen, Zhiqiang Lin, Xiao Wang et al.USENIX Security 2021 · 64 citations
- With Great Freedom Comes Great Opportunity: Rethinking Resource Allocation for Serverless FunctionsMuhammad Bilal, Marco Canini, Rodrigo Fonseca, Rodrigo RodriguesEuroSys 2023 · 51 citations
- Qapla: Policy compliance for database-backed systemsAastha Mehta, Eslam Elnikety, Katura Harvey, Deepak Garg et al.USENIX Security 2017 · 46 citations
Related papers
- GRASP: Hardening Serverless Applications through Graph Reachability Analysis of Security PoliciesIsaac Polinsky, Pubali Datta, Adam Bates, William EnckWWW 2024 · 15 citations
- Guarding Serverless Applications with KaliumDeepak Sirone Jegan, Liang Wang, Siddhant Bhagat, Michael M. SwiftUSENIX Security 2023
- CloudFlow: Identifying Security-sensitive Data Flows in Serverless ApplicationsGiuseppe Raffa, Jorge Blasco, Daniel O'Keeffe, Santanu Kumar DashUSENIX Security 2025
- Firecracker: Lightweight Virtualization for Serverless ApplicationsAlexandru Agache, Marc Brooker, Alexandra Iordache, Anthony Liguori et al.NSDI 2020 · 197 citations
- ALASTOR: Reconstructing the Provenance of Serverless IntrusionsPubali Datta, Isaac Polinsky, Muhammad Adil Inam, Adam Bates et al.USENIX Security 2022
