Lune

EMNLP Findings2022

How sensitive are translation systems to extra contexts? Mitigating gender bias in Neural Machine Translation models through relevant contexts

Shanya Sharma, Manan Dey, Koustuv Sinha

Abstract

Neural Machine Translation systems built on top of Transformer-based architectures are routinely improving the state-of-the-art in translation quality according to word-overlap metrics. However, a growing number of studies also highlight the inherent gender bias that these models incorporate during training, which reflects poorly in their translations. In this work, we investigate whether these models can be instructed to fix their bias during inference using targeted, guided instructions as contexts. By translating relevant contextual sentences during inference along with the input, we observe large improvements in reducing the gender bias in translations, across three popular test suites (WinoMT, BUG, SimpleGen). We further propose a novel metric to assess several large pretrained models (OPUS-MT, M2M-100) on their sensitivity towards using contexts during translation to correct their biases. Our approach requires no fine-tuning and thus can be used easily in production systems to de-bias translations from stereotypical gender-occupation bias 1 . We hope our method, along with our metric, can be used to build better, bias-free translation systems.

Ask Lune

Ask anything. The answer quotes the paper.

Lune reads all of it and the papers around it, then shows you the passages behind every answer.

Questions to start from

Lune answers from

the full paper · 1 top-tier paper that cites it · related work

Get the answer

Free to start. No credit card required.

Cited by top-tier papers1

  1. What the Harm? Quantifying the Tangible Impact of Gender Bias in Machine Translation with a Human-centered StudyBeatrice Savoldi, Sara Papi, Matteo Negri, Ana Guerberof Arenas et al.EMNLP 2024 · 1 citation

Builds on6

  1. Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
  2. AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
  3. Collecting a Large-Scale Gender Bias Dataset for Coreference Resolution and Machine TranslationShahar Levy, Koren Lazar, Gabriel StanovskyEMNLP Findings 2021 · 39 citations
  4. Investigating Failures of Automatic Translationin the Case of Unambiguous GenderAdi Renduchintala, Adina WilliamsACL 2022 · 28 citations
  5. The Paradox of the Compositionality of Natural Language: A Neural Machine Translation Case StudyVerna Dankers, Elia Bruni, Dieuwke HupkesACL 2022

Related papers

  1. Does Context Help Mitigate Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation?Harritxu Gete, Thierry EtchegoyhenEMNLP Findings 2024 · 3 citations
  2. A Tale of Pronouns: Interpretability Informs Gender Bias Mitigation for Fairer Instruction-Tuned Machine TranslationGiuseppe Attanasio, Flor Miriam Plaza del Arco, Debora Nozza, Anne LauscherEMNLP 2023 · 3 citations
  3. Measuring and Mitigating Name Biases in Neural Machine TranslationJun Wang, Benjamin I. P. Rubinstein, Trevor CohnACL 2022 · 31 citations
  4. Reducing Gender Bias in Neural Machine Translation as a Domain Adaptation ProblemDanielle Saunders, Bill ByrneACL 2020 · 7 citations
  5. Target-Agnostic Gender-Aware Contrastive Learning for Mitigating Bias in Multilingual Machine TranslationMinwoo Lee, Hyukhun Koh, Kang-il Lee, Dongdong Zhang et al.EMNLP 2023 · 2 citations
Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines