From Macro to Micro: Probing Dataset Diversity in Language Model Fine-Tuning
Haoyu Li, Xuhong Li, Yiming Dong, Kun Liu
Abstract
Dataset diversity plays a pivotal role for the successful training of many machine learning models, particularly in the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) stage of large language model (LLM) development. Despite increasing recognition of its importance, systematic analyses of dataset diversity still remain underexplored. To address this gap, this work presents a systematic taxonomy of existing diversity-control strategies, which primarily focus on the instruction component, operating at either macroscopic (entire instruction semantics) or mesoscopic levels (instruction units), and furthermore introduces a novel analysis of microscopic diversity within the response component, specifically analyzing the statistical distribution of tokens in SFT training samples. In the experimental evaluation, we construct fixed-size datasets (e.g., 10,000 samples each) from a corpus of 117,000 open-source SFT samples, incorporating six distinct diversity-control strategies spanning macro-, meso-, and microscopic levels applied to both instructions and responses. We then fine-tune LLMs on these datasets to assess the six diversity-control strategies. Results reveal that while macroscopic and mesoscopic strategies lead to higher performance with increasing diversity, the microscopic strategy in responses exhibits not only a stronger correlation between model performance and the degree of diversity, but also superior performance with maximum diversity across all strategies. These findings offer actionable insights for constructing high-performance SFT datasets.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b7c5a3d7-e047-4329-91d9-3cb2ff18140dCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on17
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- LoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language ModelsEdward J. Hu, Yelong Shen, Phillip Wallis, Zeyuan Allen-Zhu et al.ICLR 2022 · 18,833 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- QLoRA: Efficient Finetuning of Quantized LLMsTim Dettmers, Artidoro Pagnoni, Ari Holtzman, Luke ZettlemoyerNeurIPS 2023 · 5,863 citations
Related papers
- SIFT-50M: A Large-Scale Multilingual Dataset for Speech Instruction Fine-TuningPrabhat Pandey, Rupak Vignesh Swaminathan, K. V. Vijay Girish, Arunasish Sen et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
- Measuring Data Diversity for Instruction Tuning: A Systematic Analysis and A Reliable MetricYuming Yang, Yang Nan, Junjie Ye, Shihan Dou et al.ACL 2025 · 15 citations
- Diversity as a Reward: Fine-Tuning LLMs on a Mixture of Domain-Undetermined DataZhenqing Ling, Daoyuan Chen, Liuyi Yao, Qianli Shen et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 14 citations
- Beyond IID: Optimizing Instruction Finetuning from the Perspective of Instruction Interaction and DependencyHanyu Zhao, Li Du, Yiming Ju, Chengwei Wu et al.AAAI 2025 · 2 citations
- Analyzing the Effects of Supervised Fine-Tuning on Model Knowledge from Token and Parameter LevelsJunjie Ye, Yuming Yang, Yang Nan, Shuo Li et al.EMNLP 2025
