Efficient Test-Time Scaling of Multi-Step Reasoning by Probing Internal States of Large Language Models
Jingwei Ni, Ekaterina Fadeeva, Tianyi Wu, Mubashara Akhtar, Jiaheng Zhang, Elliott Ash, Markus Leippold, Timothy Baldwin, See-Kiong Ng, Artem Shelmanov, Mrinmaya Sachan
Abstract
LLMs can solve complex tasks by generating long, multi-step reasoning chains. Test-time scaling (TTS) can further improve LLM performance by sampling multiple variants of intermediate reasoning steps, verifying their correctness, and strategically choosing the best steps for continuation. However, existing verification approaches, such as Process Reward Models (PRMs), are computationally expensive, limited to specific domains, and require large-scale human or model-generated annotations. We propose a lightweight alternative for step-level reasoning verification based on probing the internal states of LLMs. We train a transformer-based probe that uses the internal states of the frozen LLM to estimate the credibility of its reasoning steps during generation. Annotation can be generated either by another larger LLM (e.g., DeepSeek-R1) or in a self-supervised manner by the original model itself. The probes are both effective and lightweight, containing fewer than 10M parameters. Across multiple domains, including mathematics, planning, and general knowledge question answering, our probes match or even exceed the performance of PRMs that are up to 810 × larger. Our findings suggest that the internal states of LLMs encode their confidence in reasoning processes and can serve as reliable signals for reasoning step verification, offering a promising direction towards scalable and generalizable TTS and introspective LLMs. 12
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b79c81a7-5afe-4e8e-830e-c6f192dbc40aCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on20
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Tree of Thoughts: Deliberate Problem Solving with Large Language ModelsShunyu Yao, Dian Yu, Jeffrey Zhao, Izhak Shafran et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,068 citations
- Let's Verify Step by StepHunter Lightman, Vineet Kosaraju, Yuri Burda, Harrison Edwards et al.ICLR 2024 · 3,045 citations
- Uncertainty Estimation in Autoregressive Structured PredictionAndrey Malinin, Mark J. F. GalesICLR 2021 · 439 citations
- Self-Evaluation Guided Beam Search for ReasoningYuxi Xie, Kenji Kawaguchi, Yiran Zhao, James Xu Zhao et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 316 citations
Related papers
- Incentivizing LLMs to Self-Verify Their AnswersFuxiang Zhang, Jiacheng Xu, Chaojie Wang, Ce Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 20 citations
- Guided by Gut: Efficient Test-Time Scaling with Reinforced Intrinsic ConfidenceAmirhosein Ghasemabadi, Keith G. Mills, Baochun Li, Di NiuACL 2026 · 9 citations
- Solve-Detect-Verify: Inference-Time Scaling with Flexible Generative VerifierJianyuan Zhong, Zeju Li, Zhijian Xu, Xiangyu Wen et al.ACL 2026 · 3 citations
- Scaling LLM Test-Time Compute Optimally Can be More Effective than Scaling Parameters for ReasoningCharlie Victor Snell, Jaehoon Lee, Kelvin Xu, Aviral KumarICLR 2025
- Is PRM Necessary? Problem-Solving RL Implicitly Induces PRM Capability in LLMsZhangyin Feng, Qianglong Chen, Ning Lu, Yongqian Li et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 16 citations
