Benchmarking Knowledge Boundary for Large Language Models: A Different Perspective on Model Evaluation
Xunjian Yin, Xu Zhang, Jie Ruan, Xiaojun Wan
Abstract
In recent years, substantial advancements have been made in the development of large language models, achieving remarkable performance across diverse tasks. To evaluate the knowledge ability of language models, previous studies have proposed lots of benchmarks based on question-answering pairs. We argue that it is not reliable and comprehensive to evaluate language models with a fixed question or limited paraphrases as the query, since language models are sensitive to prompt. Therefore, we introduce a novel concept named knowledge boundary to encompass both prompt-agnostic and promptsensitive knowledge within language models. Knowledge boundary avoids prompt sensitivity in language model evaluations, rendering them more dependable and robust. To explore the knowledge boundary for a given model, we propose a projected gradient descent method with semantic constraints, a new algorithm designed to identify the optimal prompt for each piece of knowledge. Experiments demonstrate a superior performance of our algorithm in computing the knowledge boundary compared to existing methods. Furthermore, we evaluate the ability of multiple language models in several domains with knowledge boundary.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b78735df-3dcc-4958-9649-1e398611ae3aCited by top-tier papers11
- Knowledge Boundary of Large Language Models: A SurveyMoxin Li, Yong Zhao, Wenxuan Zhang, Shuaiyi Li et al.ACL 2025 · 33 citations
- Adaptive Retrieval Without Self-Knowledge? Bringing Uncertainty Back HomeViktor Moskvoretskii, Maria Marina, Mikhail Salnikov, Nikolay Ivanov et al.ACL 2025 · 22 citations
- Query-Level Uncertainty in Large Language ModelsLihu Chen, Gerard de Melo, Fabian M. Suchanek, Gaël VaroquauxICLR 2026 · 15 citations
- SECA: Semantically Equivalent and Coherent Attacks for Eliciting LLM HallucinationsBuyun Liang, Liangzu Peng, Jinqi Luo, Darshan Thaker et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- EvolveBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Assessing Temporal Awareness in LLMs on Evolving KnowledgeZhiyuan Zhu, Yusheng Liao, Zhe Chen, Yuhao Wang et al.ACL 2025 · 10 citations
Builds on14
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Measuring Massive Multitask Language UnderstandingDan Hendrycks, Collin Burns, Steven Basart, Andy Zou et al.ICLR 2021 · 7,905 citations
- Locating and Editing Factual Associations in GPTKevin Meng, David Bau, Alex Andonian, Yonatan BelinkovNeurIPS 2022 · 3,415 citations
- AutoPrompt: Eliciting Knowledge from Language Models with Automatically Generated PromptsTaylor Shin, Yasaman Razeghi, Robert L. Logan IV, Eric Wallace et al.EMNLP 2020 · 1,162 citations
Related papers
- Knowledge Boundary Discovery for Large Language ModelsZiquan Wang, Zhongqi LuAAAI 2026
- Prompting is not a substitute for probability measurements in large language modelsJennifer Hu, Roger LevyEMNLP 2023 · 31 citations
- Explore What LLM Does Not Know in Complex Question AnsweringXin Lin, Zhenya Huang, Zhiqiang Zhang, Jun Zhou et al.AAAI 2025 · 8 citations
- GLaPE: Gold Label-agnostic Prompt Evaluation for Large Language ModelsXuanchang Zhang, Zhuosheng Zhang, Hai ZhaoEMNLP 2024 · 3 citations
- Detecting Knowledge Boundary of Vision Large Language Models by Sampling-Based InferenceZhuo Chen, Xinyu Wang, Yong Jiang, Zhen Zhang et al.EMNLP 2025 · 8 citations
