Securing Reset Operations in NISQ Quantum Computers
Allen Mi, Shuwen Deng, Jakub Szefer
Abstract
A secure reset operation could be an enabling technology that allows sharing of a quantum computer among different users, or among different quantum programs of the same user. Today, the dominant method to erase the qubit state is a full system wipe, which effectively resets all the qubits at the same time. In today's superconducting qubit machines from IBM, for example, a full system wipe takes up to 1000 𝜇s, and it fully erases all information in the system. However, with a full system wipe there is no means for only a few qubits to be cleared and assigned to a new user or program; everything has to be erased at the same time. A secure reset operation could allow resetting only a subset of qubits, and it could be built upon existing (insecure) reset operation available from superconducting qubit machines from IBM, for example. The (insecure) reset operation is available today, which can be used to reset the state of a qubit in a time on the order of 10 𝜇s down to 1 𝜇s. The reset operation is thus much faster than a full system wipe. However, as this work demonstrates, it is possible to leak some information across the (insecure) reset operation as it does not perfectly reset the qubit state between two users or programs who may be sequentially scheduled on the same qubit. Further, crosstalklike effects are observed where reset behavior of one qubit can be inferred from an adjacent qubit. This work analyzes the existing (insecure) reset operation in order to understand how a secure reset operation could be built upon it. This work then describes the design, implementation, and evaluation of the proposed secure reset operation which can reset qubits without leaking information, and retains a factor of 300 speedup over a full system wipe. CCS CONCEPTS • Security and privacy → Security in hardware; • Hardware → Quantum technologies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6fe6f84-39dd-4766-9226-b673888ae5ffCited by top-tier papers2
- Securing NISQ Quantum Computer Reset Operations Against Higher Energy State AttacksChuanqi Xu, Jessie Chen, Allen Mi, Jakub SzeferCCS 2023 · 10 citations
- Security Attacks Abusing Pulse-level Quantum CircuitsChuanqi Xu, Jakub SzeferS&P 2025
Builds on4
- Software Mitigation of Crosstalk on Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum ComputersPrakash Murali, David C. McKay, Margaret Martonosi, Ali Javadi-AbhariASPLOS 2020 · 253 citations
- C3APSULe: Cross-FPGA Covert-Channel Attacks through Power Supply Unit LeakageIlias Giechaskiel, Kasper Bonne Rasmussen, Jakub SzeferS&P 2020 · 74 citations
- Systematic Crosstalk Mitigation for Superconducting Qubits via Frequency-Aware CompilationYongshan Ding, Pranav Gokhale, Sophia Fuhui Lin, Richard Rines et al.MICRO 2020 · 67 citations
- QuCloud: A New Qubit Mapping Mechanism for Multi-programming Quantum Computing in Cloud EnvironmentLei Liu, Xinglei DouHPCA 2021 · 60 citations
Related papers
- Quantum Key Leasing for PKE and FHE with a Classical LessorOrestis Chardouvelis, Vipul Goyal, Aayush Jain, Jiahui LiuEUROCRYPT 2025 · 3 citations
- Borrowing Dirty Qubits in Quantum ProgramsBonan Su, Li Zhou, Yuan Feng, Mingsheng YingASPLOS 2026 · 1 citation
- Crosstalk-induced Side Channel Threats in Multi-Tenant NISQ ComputersNavnil Choudhury, Chaithanya Naik Mude, Sanjay Das, Preetham Chandra Tikkireddi et al.NDSS 2025
- Scaling Qubit Readout with Hardware Efficient Machine Learning ArchitecturesSatvik Maurya, Chaithanya Naik Mude, William D. Oliver, Benjamin Lienhard et al.ISCA 2023 · 30 citations
- Suppressing ZZ crosstalk of Quantum computers through pulse and scheduling co-optimizationLei Xie, Jidong Zhai, Zhenxing Zhang, Jonathan Allcock et al.ASPLOS 2022 · 28 citations
