With False Friends Like These, Who Can Notice Mistakes?
Lue Tao, Lei Feng, Jinfeng Yi, Songcan Chen
Abstract
Adversarial examples crafted by an explicit adversary have attracted significant attention in machine learning. However, the security risk posed by a potential false friend has been largely overlooked. In this paper, we unveil the threat of hypocritical examples---inputs that are originally misclassified yet perturbed by a false friend to force correct predictions. While such perturbed examples seem harmless, we point out for the first time that they could be maliciously used to conceal the mistakes of a substandard (i.e., not as good as required) model during an evaluation. Once a deployer trusts the hypocritical performance and applies the "well-performed" model in real-world applications, unexpected failures may happen even in benign environments. More seriously, this security risk seems to be pervasive: we find that many types of substandard models are vulnerable to hypocritical examples across multiple datasets. Furthermore, we provide the first attempt to characterize the threat with a metric called hypocritical risk and try to circumvent it via several countermeasures. Results demonstrate the effectiveness of the countermeasures, while the risk remains non-negligible even after adaptive robust training.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6f64fe3-3cc7-41a1-9b26-7f17af45dee5Cited by top-tier papers4
- Better Safe Than Sorry: Preventing Delusive Adversaries with Adversarial TrainingLue Tao, Lei Feng, Jinfeng Yi, Sheng-Jun Huang et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 90 citations
- Can Adversarial Training Be Manipulated By Non-Robust Features?Lue Tao, Lei Feng, Hongxin Wei, Jinfeng Yi et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 20 citations
- Squeeze Training for Adversarial RobustnessQizhang Li, Yiwen Guo, Wangmeng Zuo, Hao ChenICLR 2023 · 2 citations
- On the Vulnerability of Adversarially Trained Models Against Two-faced AttacksShengjie Zhou, Lue Tao, Yuzhou Cao, Tao Xiang et al.ICLR 2024
Builds on19
- Towards Evaluating the Robustness of Neural NetworksNicholas Carlini, David A. WagnerS&P 2017 · 9,786 citations
- Reliable evaluation of adversarial robustness with an ensemble of diverse parameter-free attacksFrancesco Croce, Matthias HeinICML 2020 · 2,337 citations
- Overfitting in adversarially robust deep learningLeslie Rice, Eric Wong, J. Zico KolterICML 2020 · 935 citations
- Adversarial Weight Perturbation Helps Robust GeneralizationDongxian Wu, Shu-Tao Xia, Yisen WangNeurIPS 2020 · 917 citations
- Improving Adversarial Robustness Requires Revisiting Misclassified ExamplesYisen Wang, Difan Zou, Jinfeng Yi, James Bailey et al.ICLR 2020 · 829 citations
Related papers
- Doppelgangers and Adversarial VulnerabilityGeorge I. KamberovCVPR 2025
- Two Coupled Rejection Metrics Can Tell Adversarial Examples ApartTianyu Pang, Huishuai Zhang, Di He, Yinpeng Dong et al.CVPR 2022 · 13 citations
- Confidential Guardian: Cryptographically Prohibiting the Abuse of Model AbstentionStephan Rabanser, Ali Shahin Shamsabadi, Olive Franzese, Xiao Wang et al.ICML 2025
- Fundamental Tradeoffs between Invariance and Sensitivity to Adversarial PerturbationsFlorian Tramèr, Jens Behrmann, Nicholas Carlini, Nicolas Papernot et al.ICML 2020 · 103 citations
- Group-based Robustness: A General Framework for Customized Robustness in the Real WorldWeiran Lin, Keane Lucas, Neo Eyal, Lujo Bauer et al.NDSS 2024
