Handwriting for Text Input and the Impact of XR Displays, Surface Alignments, and Sentence Complexities
Florian Kern, Jonathan Tschanter, Marc Erich Latoschik
Abstract
Text input is desirable across various eXtended Reality (XR) use cases and is particularly crucial for knowledge and office work. This article compares handwriting text input between Virtual Reality (VR) and Video See-Through Augmented Reality (VST AR), facilitated by physically aligned and mid-air surfaces when writing simple and complex sentences. In a experimental design, 72 participants performed two ten-minute handwriting sessions, each including ten simple and ten complex sentences representing text input in real-world scenarios. Our developed handwriting application supports different XR displays, surface alignments, and handwriting recognition based on digital ink. We evaluated usability, user experience, task load, text input performance, and handwriting style. Our results indicate high usability with a successful transfer of handwriting skills to the virtual domain. XR displays and surface alignments did not impact text input speed and error rate. However, sentence complexities did, with participants achieving higher input speeds and fewer errors for simple sentences (17.85 WPM, 0.51% MSD ER) than complex sentences (15.07 WPM, 1.74% MSD ER). Handwriting on physically aligned surfaces showed higher learnability and lower physical demand, making them more suitable for prolonged handwriting sessions. Handwriting on mid-air surfaces yielded higher novelty and stimulation ratings, which might diminish with more experience. Surface alignments and sentence complexities significantly affected handwriting style, leading to enlarged and more connected cursive writing in both mid-air and for simple sentences. The study also demonstrated the benefits of using XR controllers in a pen-like posture to mimic styluses and pressure-sensitive tips on physical surfaces for input detection. We additionally provide a phrase set of simple and complex sentences as a basis for future text input studies, which can be expanded and adapted.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b6c88ecd-28f6-4a69-9f0f-c89b4efeac23Related papers
- Text Input for Non-Stationary XR Workspaces: Investigating Tap and Word-Gesture Keyboards in Virtual and Augmented RealityFlorian Kern, Florian Niebling, Marc Erich LatoschikIEEE VR 2023 · 40 citations
- SwEYEpinch and Beyond: Exploring Intuitive, Efficient Text Entry for Extended Reality via Eye and Hand TrackingZiheng 'Leo' Li, Xichen He, Mengyuan Wu, Zeyi Tong et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
- STAR: Smartphone-analogous Typing in Augmented RealityTaejun Kim, Amy Karlson, Aakar Gupta, Tovi Grossman et al.UIST 2023 · 26 citations
- FanType: Intention-Inferring Fan-Shaped Thumb Interface for Text Entry on Small XR KeyboardsGuanghan Zhao, Louis Teys, Gyeonghwan Yang, Shengdong Zhao et al.IEEE VR 2026
- InkFlow: Connected Handwriting Recognition for Natural Mid-Air Input in Mixed RealityXufeng Jian, Qi Qi, Linpei Zhang, Haifeng Sun et al.CHI 2026 · 1 citation
