Learning with Exact Invariances in Polynomial Time
Ashkan Soleymani, Behrooz Tahmasebi, Stefanie Jegelka, Patrick Jaillet
Abstract
We study the statistical-computational trade-offs for learning with exact invariances (or symmetries) using kernel regression. Traditional methods, such as data augmentation, group averaging, canonicalization, and frame-averaging, either fail to provide a polynomial-time solution or are not applicable in the kernel setting. However, with oracle access to the geometric properties of the input space, we propose a polynomial-time algorithm that learns a classifier with exact invariances. Moreover, our approach achieves the same excess population risk (or generalization error) as the original kernel regression problem. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first polynomialtime algorithm to achieve exact (as opposed to approximate) invariances in this setting, partially addressing a question posed by Díaz et al. (2025) regarding the avoidance of prohibitively large and computationally intensive group averaging methods in kernel regression with exact invariances. Our proof leverages tools from differential geometry, spectral theory, and optimization. A key result in our development is a new reformulation of the problem of learning under invariances as optimizing an infinite number of linearly constrained convex quadratic programs, which may be of independent interest.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6c312c4-e62a-4a58-92bb-30ffc6747c1aCited by top-tier papers2
- Achieving Approximate Symmetry Is Exponentially Easier than Exact SymmetryBehrooz Tahmasebi, Melanie WeberICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- Adaptive Symmetry Discovery for Dynamical System IdentificationBehrooz Tahmasebi, Melanie WeberICML 2026 · 1 citation
Builds on15
- Equivariant Flows: Exact Likelihood Generative Learning for Symmetric DensitiesJonas Köhler, Leon Klein, Frank NoéICML 2020 · 330 citations
- Frame Averaging for Invariant and Equivariant Network DesignOmri Puny, Matan Atzmon, Edward J. Smith, Ishan Misra et al.ICLR 2022 · 177 citations
- Equivariance with Learned Canonicalization FunctionsSékou-Oumar Kaba, Arnab Kumar Mondal, Yan Zhang, Yoshua Bengio et al.ICML 2023 · 109 citations
- Provably Strict Generalisation Benefit for Equivariant ModelsBryn Elesedy, Sheheryar ZaidiICML 2021 · 100 citations
- Learning Invariances in Neural Networks from Training DataGregory W. Benton, Marc Finzi, Pavel Izmailov, Andrew Gordon WilsonNeurIPS 2020 · 78 citations
Related papers
- The Exact Sample Complexity Gain from Invariances for Kernel RegressionBehrooz Tahmasebi, Stefanie JegelkaNeurIPS 2023 · 29 citations
- A Canonicalization Perspective on Invariant and Equivariant LearningGeorge Ma, Yifei Wang, Derek Lim, Stefanie Jegelka et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 38 citations
- On the Sample Complexity of Learning under Geometric StabilityAlberto Bietti, Luca Venturi, Joan BrunaNeurIPS 2021 · 45 citations
- Equivariance via Minimal Frame Averaging for More Symmetries and EfficiencyYuchao Lin, Jacob Helwig, Shurui Gui, Shuiwang JiICML 2024 · 20 citations
- Convex Representation Learning for Generalized Invariance in Semi-Inner-Product SpaceYingyi Ma, Vignesh Ganapathiraman, Yaoliang Yu, Xinhua ZhangICML 2020 · 1 citation
