Bridging Central and Local Differential Privacy in Data Acquisition Mechanisms
Alireza Fallah, Ali Makhdoumi, Azarakhsh Malekian, Asuman E. Ozdaglar
Abstract
We study the design of optimal Bayesian data acquisition mechanisms for a platform interested in estimating the mean of a distribution by collecting data from privacy-conscious users. In our setting, users have heterogeneous sensitivities for two types of privacy losses corresponding to local and central differential privacy measures. The local privacy loss is due to the leakage of a user’s information when she shares her data with the platform, and the central privacy loss is due to the released estimate by the platform to the public. The users share their data in exchange for a payment (e.g., through monetary transfers or services) that compensates for their privacy losses. The platform knows the distribution of privacy sensitivities but not their realizations, and must design a mechanism to solicit their preferences and then deliver both local and central privacy guarantees while minimizing the estimation error plus the expected payment to users. We first establish minimax lower bounds for the estimation error, given a vector of privacy guarantees, and show that a linear estimator is (near) optimal. We then turn to our main goal: designing an optimal data acquisition mechanism. We establish that the design of such mechanisms in a Bayesian setting (where the platform knows the distribution of users’ sensitivities and not their realizations) can be cast as a nonconvex optimization problem. Additionally, for the class of linear estimators, we prove that finding the optimal mechanism admits a Polynomial Time Approximation Scheme.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6c2fd58-003d-41a0-a067-ef10e9c8fb2fCited by top-tier papers3
- Truthful High Dimensional Sparse Linear RegressionLiyang Zhu, Amina Manseur, Meng Ding, Jinyan Liu et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 4 citations
- Data Pricing via Competitive EquilibriumBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Aniket Murhekar, Jiaxin SongWWW 2026 · 1 citation
- Equilibrium Pricing in Oligopolistic Data MarketsBhaskar Ray Chaudhury, Jugal Garg, Eklavya Sharma, Jiaxin SongICML 2026
Builds on1
Related papers
- Instance-optimal Mean Estimation Under Differential PrivacyZiyue Huang, Yuting Liang, Ke YiNeurIPS 2021 · 74 citations
- Mind the Gap: Mixtures of Gaussians in Approximate Differential PrivacyHuikang Liu, Aras Selvi, Wolfram WiesemannICML 2026
- Mechanism Design for Collaborative Normal Mean EstimationYiding Chen, Jerry Zhu, Kirthevasan KandasamyNeurIPS 2023 · 15 citations
- Truthful Data Acquisition via Peer PredictionYiling Chen, Yiheng Shen, Shuran ZhengNeurIPS 2020 · 35 citations
- Local Differential Privacy for Bayesian OptimizationXingyu Zhou, Jian TanAAAI 2021 · 28 citations
