Disentangling the Predictive Variance of Deep Ensembles through the Neural Tangent Kernel
Seijin Kobayashi, Pau Vilimelis Aceituno, Johannes von Oswald
Abstract
Identifying unfamiliar inputs, also known as out-of-distribution (OOD) detection, is a crucial property of any decision making process. A simple and empirically validated technique is based on deep ensembles where the variance of predictions over different neural networks acts as a substitute for input uncertainty. Nevertheless, a theoretical understanding of the inductive biases leading to the performance of deep ensemble's uncertainty estimation is missing. To improve our description of their behavior, we study deep ensembles with large layer widths operating in simplified linear training regimes, in which the functions trained with gradient descent can be described by the neural tangent kernel. We identify two sources of noise, each inducing a distinct inductive bias in the predictive variance at initialization. We further show theoretically and empirically that both noise sources affect the predictive variance of non-linear deep ensembles in toy models and realistic settings after training. Finally, we propose practical ways to eliminate part of these noise sources leading to significant changes and improved OOD detection in trained deep ensembles.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b6bb6162-5598-4b76-941b-53e70e6b805cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on9
- Bayesian Deep Learning and a Probabilistic Perspective of GeneralizationAndrew Gordon Wilson, Pavel IzmailovNeurIPS 2020 · 845 citations
- BatchEnsemble: an Alternative Approach to Efficient Ensemble and Lifelong LearningYeming Wen, Dustin Tran, Jimmy BaICLR 2020 · 569 citations
- Deep learning versus kernel learning: an empirical study of loss landscape geometry and the time evolution of the Neural Tangent KernelStanislav Fort, Gintare Karolina Dziugaite, Mansheej Paul, Sepideh Kharaghani et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 255 citations
- Finite Versus Infinite Neural Networks: an Empirical StudyJaehoon Lee, Samuel S. Schoenholz, Jeffrey Pennington, Ben Adlam et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 245 citations
- When Do Neural Networks Outperform Kernel Methods?Behrooz Ghorbani, Song Mei, Theodor Misiakiewicz, Andrea MontanariNeurIPS 2020 · 217 citations
Related papers
- Bayesian Deep Ensembles via the Neural Tangent KernelBobby He, Balaji Lakshminarayanan, Yee Whye TehNeurIPS 2020 · 136 citations
- Emergent Equivariance in Deep EnsemblesJan E. Gerken, Pan KesselICML 2024 · 14 citations
- Single Model Uncertainty Estimation via Stochastic Data CenteringJayaraman J. Thiagarajan, Rushil Anirudh, Vivek Sivaraman Narayanaswamy, Timo BremerNeurIPS 2022 · 35 citations
- Uncertainty Quantification with the Empirical Neural Tangent KernelJoseph Wilson, Chris van der Heide, Liam Hodgkinson, Fred RoostaNeurIPS 2025 · 11 citations
- Conservative Uncertainty Estimation By Fitting Prior NetworksKamil Ciosek, Vincent Fortuin, Ryota Tomioka, Katja Hofmann et al.ICLR 2020 · 65 citations
