Trkic G00gle: Why and How Users Game Translation Algorithms
Soomin Kim, Changhoon Oh, Won-Ik Cho, Donghoon Shin, Bongwon Suh, Joonhwan Lee
Abstract
Individuals interact with algorithms in various ways. Users even game and circumvent algorithms so as to achieve favorable outcomes. This study aims to come to an understanding of how various stakeholders interact with each other in tricking algorithms, with a focus towards online review communities. We employed a mixed-method approach in order to explore how and why users write machine non-translatable reviews as well as how those encrypted messages are perceived by those receiving them. We found that users are able to find tactics to trick the algorithms in order to avoid censoring, to mitigate interpersonal burden, to protect privacy, and to provide authentic information for enabling the formation of informative review communities. They apply several linguistic and social strategies in this regard. Furthermore, users perceive encrypted messages as both more trustworthy and authentic. Based on these findings, we discuss implications for online review community and content moderation algorithms.
CCS Concepts: • Human-centered computing → User studies.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b664d974-9bbf-476b-be2a-e29897e14ff7Cited by top-tier papers3
- Hashtag Re-Appropriation for Audience Control on Recommendation-Driven Social Media Xiaohongshu (rednote)Ruyuan Wan, Lingbo Tong, Tiffany Knearem, Toby Jia-Jun Li et al.CHI 2025 · 19 citations
- Hate Raids on Twitch: Understanding Real-Time Human-Bot Coordinated Attacks in Live Streaming CommunitiesJie Cai, Sagnik Chowdhury, Hongyang Zhou, Donghee Yvette WohnCSCW 2023 · 17 citations
- "Newspaper Eat" Means "Not Tasty": A Taxonomy and Benchmark for Coded Language in Real-World Chinese Online ReviewsRuyuan Wan, Changye Li, Ting-Hao 'Kenneth' HuangACL 2026
Builds on5
- Bot in the Bunch: Facilitating Group Chat Discussion by Improving Efficiency and Participation with a ChatbotSoomin Kim, Jinsu Eun, Changhoon Oh, Bongwon Suh et al.CHI 2020 · 132 citations
- Will the Crowd Game the Algorithm?: Using Layperson Judgments to Combat Misinformation on Social Media by Downranking Distrusted SourcesZiv Epstein, Gordon Pennycook, David G. RandCHI 2020 · 68 citations
- Unmet Needs and Opportunities for Mobile Translation AIDaniel J. Liebling, Michal Lahav, Abigail Evans, Aaron Donsbach et al.CHI 2020 · 47 citations
- How to Trick AI: Users' Strategies for Protecting Themselves from Automatic Personality AssessmentSarah Theres Völkel, Renate Häuslschmid, Anna Werner, Heinrich Hussmann et al.CHI 2020 · 31 citations
- 3 Stars on Yelp, 4 Stars on Google Maps: A Cross-Platform Examination of Restaurant RatingsHanlin Li, Brent J. HechtCSCW 2020 · 25 citations
Related papers
- Towards Designing Social Interventions for Online Climate Change Denialism DiscussionsRuican Zhong, Shruti Phadke, Beth Goldberg, Tanushree MitraCSCW 2025
- Understanding Underground Incentivized Review ServicesRajvardhan Oak, Zubair ShafiqCHI 2024 · 5 citations
- 'Whoever needs to see it, will see it': Motivations and Labor of Creating Algorithmic Conspirituality Content on TikTokAnkolika De, Kelley Cotter, Shaheen Kanthawala, Haley McAtee et al.CSCW 2025 · 4 citations
- When the "Matchmaker" Does Not Have Your Interest at Heart: Perceived Algorithmic Harms, Folk Theories, and Users' Counter-Strategies on TinderFatemeh Alizadeh, Dennis Lawo, Gunnar Stevens, Douglas Zytko et al.CSCW 2024 · 15 citations
- On Targeted Manipulation and Deception when Optimizing LLMs for User FeedbackMarcus Williams, Micah Carroll, Adhyyan Narang, Constantin Weisser et al.ICLR 2025
