"Who said it, and Why?" Provenance for Natural Language Claims
Yi Zhang, Zachary G. Ives, Dan Roth
Abstract
In an era where generating content and publishing it is so easy, we are bombarded with information and are exposed to all kinds of claims, some of which do not always rank high on the truth scale. This paper suggests that the key to a longer-term, holistic, and systematic approach to navigating this information pollution is capturing the provenance of claims. To do that, we develop a formal definition of provenance graph for a given natural language claim, aiming to understand where the claim may come from and how it has evolved. To construct the graph, we model provenance inference, formulated mainly as an information extraction task and addressed via a textual entailment model. We evaluate our approach using two benchmark datasets, showing initial success in capturing the notion of provenance and its effectiveness on the application of claim verification.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itRelated papers
- What is Your Article Based On? Inferring Fine-grained ProvenanceYi Zhang, Zachary G. Ives, Dan RothACL 2021
- Characterizing and Verifying Scientific Claims: Qualitative Causal Structure is All You NeedJinxuan Wu, Wenhan Chao, Xian Zhou, Zhunchen LuoEMNLP 2023 · 1 citation
- NewsClaims: A New Benchmark for Claim Detection from News with Attribute KnowledgeRevanth Gangi Reddy, Sai Chetan Chinthakindi, Zhenhailong Wang, Yi R. Fung et al.EMNLP 2022 · 13 citations
- WatClaimCheck: A new Dataset for Claim Entailment and InferenceKashif Khan, Ruizhe Wang, Pascal PoupartACL 2022
- Beyond Static Artifacts: An Evolutionary Framework for Synthetic Claim GenerationYeqing Teng, Jiasheng Si, Shuxia Lin, Linhai Zhang et al.ACL 2026
