Seeing Is Coding: On the Effectiveness of Vision Language Models in Code Understanding
Yuling Shi, Chaoxiang Xie, Zhensu Sun, Yeheng Chen, Chenxu Zhang, Longfei Yun, Chengcheng Wan, Hongyu Zhang, David Lo, Xiaodong Gu
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in source code understanding, yet as software systems grow in scale, computational efficiency has become a critical bottleneck. Currently, these models rely on a text-based paradigm that treats source code as a linear sequence of tokens, which leads to a linear increase in context length and associated computational costs. The rapid advancement of Multimodal LLMs (MLLMs) introduces an opportunity to optimize efficiency by representing source code as rendered images. Unlike text, which is difficult to compress without losing semantic meaning, the image modality is inherently suitable for compression. By adjusting resolution, images can be scaled to a fraction of their original token cost while remaining recognizable to vision-capable models. To explore the feasibility of this approach, we conduct the first systematic study on the effectiveness of MLLMs for code understanding. Our experiments reveal that: (1) MLLMs can effectively understand code with substantial token reduction, achieving up to 8× compression; (2) MLLMs can effectively leverage visual cues such as syntax highlighting, improving code completion performance under 4× compression; and (3) Code-understanding tasks like clone detection exhibit exceptional resilience to visual compression, with some compression ratios even slightly outperforming raw text inputs. Our findings highlight both the potential and current limitations of MLLMs in code understanding, which points out a shift toward image-modality code representation as a pathway to more efficient inference.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Builds on30
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- DistServe: Disaggregating Prefill and Decoding for Goodput-optimized Large Language Model ServingYinmin Zhong, Shengyu Liu, Junda Chen, Jianbo Hu et al.OSDI 2024 · 646 citations
- TrOCR: Transformer-Based Optical Character Recognition with Pre-trained ModelsMinghao Li, Tengchao Lv, Jingye Chen, Lei Cui et al.AAAI 2023 · 607 citations
- LayoutLM: Pre-training of Text and Layout for Document Image UnderstandingYiheng Xu, Minghao Li, Lei Cui, Shaohan Huang et al.KDD 2020 · 575 citations
- What Is Wrong With Scene Text Recognition Model Comparisons? Dataset and Model AnalysisJeonghun Baek, Geewook Kim, Junyeop Lee, Sungrae Park et al.ICCV 2019 · 551 citations
Related papers
- EfficientUICoder: A Bidirectional Token Compression Framework for Efficient MLLM-Based UI Code GenerationJingyu Xiao, Zhongyi Zhang, Yuxuan Wan, Yintong Huo et al.FSE 2026
- Inference Optimal VLMs Need Fewer Visual Tokens and More ParametersKevin Y. Li, Sachin Goyal, João D. Semedo, J. Zico KolterICLR 2025
- The Hidden Cost of Readability: How Code Formatting Silently Consumes Your LLM BudgetDangfeng Pan, Zhensu Sun, Cenyuan Zhang, David Lo et al.ICSE 2026
- Efficient Large Multi-modal Models via Visual Context CompressionJieneng Chen, Luoxin Ye, Ju He, Zhaoyang Wang et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 49 citations
- AIM: Adaptive Inference of Multi-Modal LLMs via Token Merging and PruningYiwu Zhong, Zhuoming Liu, Yin Li, Liwei WangICCV 2025 · 1 citation
