Les Dissonances: Cross-Tool Harvesting and Polluting in Pool-of-Tools Empowered LLM Agents
Zichuan Li, Jian Cui, Xiaojing Liao, Luyi Xing
Abstract
Large Language Model (LLM) agents are autonomous systems powered by LLMs, capable of reasoning and planning to solve problems by leveraging a set of tools. However, the integration of multi-tool capabilities in LLM agents introduces challenges in securely managing tools, ensuring their compatibility, handling dependency relationships, and protecting control flows within LLM agent workflows. In this paper, we present the first systematic security analysis of task control flows in multi-tool-enabled LLM agents. We identify a novel threat, Cross-Tool Harvesting and Polluting (XTHP), which includes multiple attack vectors to first hijack the normal control flows of agent tasks, and then collect and pollute confidential or private information within LLM agent systems. To understand the impact of this threat, we developed Chord, a dynamic scanning tool designed to automatically detect real-world agent tools susceptible to XTHP attacks. Our evaluation of 66 real-world tools from the repositories of two major LLM agent development frameworks, LangChain and LlamaIndex, revealed a significant security concern: 75% are vulnerable to XTHP attacks, highlighting the prevalence of this threat.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b5bc8d23-9973-4af8-b328-9d803d8e959cCited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on14
- WebShop: Towards Scalable Real-World Web Interaction with Grounded Language AgentsShunyu Yao, Howard Chen, John Yang, Karthik NarasimhanNeurIPS 2022 · 1,477 citations
- AgentPoison: Red-teaming LLM Agents via Poisoning Memory or Knowledge BasesZhaorun Chen, Zhen Xiang, Chaowei Xiao, Dawn Song et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 539 citations
- Identifying the Risks of LM Agents with an LM-Emulated SandboxYangjun Ruan, Honghua Dong, Andrew Wang, Silviu Pitis et al.ICLR 2024 · 292 citations
- MetaTool Benchmark for Large Language Models: Deciding Whether to Use Tools and Which to UseYue Huang, Jiawen Shi, Yuan Li, Chenrui Fan et al.ICLR 2024 · 188 citations
- Prompt Injection Attack to Tool Selection in LLM AgentsJiawen Shi, Zenghui Yuan, Guiyao Tie, Pan Zhou et al.NDSS 2026 · 181 citations
Related papers
- Think Twice Before You Act: Protecting LLM Agents Against Tool Description Poisoning via Isolated PlanningShanghao Shi, Xiao Wang, Chaoyu Zhang, Hao Li et al.ICML 2026 · 1 citation
- Parasites in the Toolchain: A Large-Scale Analysis of Attacks on the MCP EcosystemShuli Zhao, Qinsheng Hou, Zihan Zhan, Yanhao Wang et al.S&P 2026 · 20 citations
- IPIGuard: A Novel Tool Dependency Graph-Based Defense Against Indirect Prompt Injection in LLM AgentsHengyu An, Jinghuai Zhang, Tianyu Du, Chunyi Zhou et al.EMNLP 2025
- Attractive Metadata Attack: Inducing LLM Agents to Invoke Malicious ToolsKanghua Mo, Li Hu, Yucheng Long, Zhihao LiNeurIPS 2025 · 37 citations
- When LLMs Go Online: The Emerging Threat of Web-Enabled LLMsHanna Kim, Minkyoo Song, Seung Ho Na, Seungwon Shin et al.USENIX Security 2025
