The Phantom Menace in Crypto-Based PET-Hardened Deep Learning Models: Invisible Configuration-Induced Attacks
Yiteng Peng, Dongwei Xiao, Zhibo Liu, Zhenlan Ji, Daoyuan Wu, Shuai Wang, Juergen Rahmel
Abstract
The increasing use of deep learning (DL) models has given rise to significant privacy concerns regarding training and inference data. To address these concerns, the community has increasingly adopted crypto-based privacy-enhancing technologies (CPET) like homomorphic encryption (HE), secure multi-party computation (MPC), and zero-knowledge proofs (ZKP). The integration of CPET with DL, often referred to as CPET-DL, is commonly facilitated by specialized frameworks like CrypTen, TenSEAL, and EZKL. These frameworks offer configurable parameters to balance model accuracy and computational efficiency during privacy-preserving operations. However, these configurations, while seemingly harmless, can introduce subtle vulnerabilities. The stealthy attacks induced by misconfigurations are hard to detect because 1) the plaintext models remain vulnerability-free, and 2) existing auditing tools are hardly applicable to CPET-hardened models. This creates a paradox: tools intended to protect privacy can be undermined through configuration manipulation.
We present ConPETro, the first attack on CPET-hardened models by manipulating the CPET-DL framework configurations. We show that well-crafted configurations allow attackers to create CPET-hardened models that function similarly to benign plaintext models under normal inputs, but exhibit significantly reduced robustness for malicious inputs embedded with triggers. ConPETro
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b5ada50b-6ae6-4e6b-8f19-5de55cfe5a53Builds on35
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Membership Inference Attacks Against Machine Learning ModelsReza Shokri, Marco Stronati, Congzheng Song, Vitaly ShmatikovS&P 2017 · 5,137 citations
- Manipulating Machine Learning: Poisoning Attacks and Countermeasures for Regression LearningMatthew Jagielski, Alina Oprea, Battista Biggio, Chang Liu et al.S&P 2018 · 867 citations
- CrypTen: Secure Multi-Party Computation Meets Machine LearningBrian Knott, Shobha Venkataraman, Awni Y. Hannun, Shubho Sengupta et al.NeurIPS 2021 · 573 citations
- LIRA: Learnable, Imperceptible and Robust Backdoor AttacksKhoa D. Doan, Yingjie Lao, Weijie Zhao, Ping LiICCV 2021 · 313 citations
Related papers
- MPCDiff: Testing and Repairing MPC-Hardened Deep Learning ModelsQi Pang, Yuanyuan Yuan, Shuai WangNDSS 2024
- Hadal: Centralized Label DP without a Trusted PartyJames Choncholas, Stanislav Peceny, Amit Agarwal, Mariana Raykova et al.S&P 2026
- Is MPC Secure? Leveraging Neural Network Classifiers to Detect Data Leakage Vulnerabilities in MPC ImplementationsGuopeng Lin, Xiaoning Du, Lushan Song, Weili Han et al.S&P 2025
- Testing and Understanding Deviation Behaviors in FHE-Hardened Machine Learning ModelsYiteng Peng, Daoyuan Wu, Zhibo Liu, Dongwei Xiao et al.ICSE 2025 · 1 citation
- CompLeak: Deep Learning Model Compression Exacerbates Privacy LeakageNa Li, Yansong Gao, Hongsheng Hu, Boyu Kuang et al.USENIX Security 2026
