MatRiCT: Efficient, Scalable and Post-Quantum Blockchain Confidential Transactions Protocol
Muhammed F. Esgin, Raymond K. Zhao, Ron Steinfeld, Joseph K. Liu, Dongxi Liu
Abstract
We introduce MatRiCT, an efficient RingCT protocol for blockchain confidential transactions, whose security is based on "post-quantum'' (module) lattice assumptions. The proof length of the protocol is around two orders of magnitude shorter than the existing post-quantum proposal, and scales efficiently to large anonymity sets, unlike the existing proposal. Further, we provide the first full implementation of a post-quantum RingCT, demonstrating the practicality of our scheme. In particular, a typical transaction can be generated in a fraction of a second and verified in about 23 ms on a standard PC. Moreover, we show how our scheme can be extended to provide auditability, where a user can select a particular authority from a set of authorities to reveal her identity. The user also has the ability to select no auditing and all these auditing options may co-exist in the same environment. The key ingredients, introduced in this work, of MatRiCT are 1) the shortest to date scalable ring signature from standard lattice assumptions with no Gaussian sampling required, 2) a novel balance zero-knowledge proof and 3) a novel extractable commitment scheme from (module) lattices. We believe these ingredients to be of independent interest for other privacy-preserving applications such as secure e-voting. Despite allowing 64-bit precision for transaction amounts, our new balance proof, and thus our protocol, does not require a range proof on a wide range (such as 32- or 64-bit ranges), which has been a major obstacle against efficient lattice-based solutions. Further, we provide new formal definitions for RingCT-like protocols, where the real-world blockchain setting is captured more closely. The definitions are applicable in a generic setting, and thus are believed to contribute to the development of future confidential transaction protocols in general (not only in the lattice setting).
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b58c0a38-7243-435c-8a9d-70ba3c97ffbfCited by top-tier papers16
- Lattice-Based Zero-Knowledge Proofs and Applications: Shorter, Simpler, and More GeneralVadim Lyubashevsky, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Maxime PlançonCRYPTO 2022 · 125 citations
- Practical Product Proofs for Lattice CommitmentsThomas Attema, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregor SeilerCRYPTO 2020 · 60 citations
- MatRiCT+: More Efficient Post-Quantum Private Blockchain PaymentsMuhammed F. Esgin, Ron Steinfeld, Raymond K. ZhaoS&P 2022 · 59 citations
- Group Signatures and More from Isogenies and Lattices: Generic, Simple, and EfficientWard Beullens, Samuel Dobson, Shuichi Katsumata, Yi-Fu Lai et al.EUROCRYPT 2022 · 51 citations
- Practical Lattice-Based Zero-Knowledge Proofs for Integer RelationsVadim Lyubashevsky, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Gregor SeilerCCS 2020 · 41 citations
Related papers
- SMILE: Set Membership from Ideal Lattices with Applications to Ring Signatures and Confidential TransactionsVadim Lyubashevsky, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Gregor SeilerCRYPTO 2021 · 49 citations
- BulletCT: Towards More Scalable Ring Confidential Transactions With Transparent SetupNan Wang, Qianhui Wang, Dongxi Liu, Muhammed F. Esgin et al.USENIX Security 2025
- Leaking Arbitrarily Many Secrets: Any-out-of-Many Proofs and Applications to RingCT ProtocolsTianyu Zheng, Shang Gao, Yubo Song, Bin XiaoS&P 2023
- Efficient Range Proofs with Transparent Setup from Bounded Integer CommitmentsGeoffroy Couteau, Michael Klooß, Huang Lin, Michael ReichleEUROCRYPT 2021 · 37 citations
- Practical Quantum-Safe Voting from LatticesRafaël del Pino, Vadim Lyubashevsky, Gregory Neven, Gregor SeilerCCS 2017 · 51 citations
