ExpGuard: LLM Content Moderation in Specialized Domains
Minseok Choi, Dongjin Kim, Seungbin Yang, Subin Kim, Youngjun Kwak, Juyoung Oh, Jaegul Choo, Jungmin Son
Abstract
With the growing deployment of large language models (LLMs) in real-world applications, establishing robust safety guardrails to moderate their inputs and outputs has become essential to ensure adherence to safety policies. Current guardrail models predominantly address general human-LLM interactions, rendering LLMs vulnerable to harmful and adversarial content within domain-specific contexts, particularly those rich in technical jargon and specialized concepts. To address this limitation, we introduce ExpGuard, a robust and specialized guardrail model designed to protect against harmful prompts and responses across financial, medical, and legal domains. In addition, we present ExpGuardMix, a meticulously curated dataset comprising 58,928 labeled prompts paired with corresponding refusal and compliant responses, from these specific sectors. This dataset is divided into two subsets: ExpGuardTrain, for model training, and ExpGuardTest, a high-quality test set annotated by domain experts to evaluate model robustness against technical and domain-specific content. Comprehensive evaluations conducted on ExpGuardTest and eight established public benchmarks reveal that ExpGuard delivers competitive performance across the board while demonstrating exceptional resilience to domain-specific adversarial attacks, surpassing state-of-the-art models such as WildGuard by up to 8.9% in prompt classification and 15.3% in response classification. To encourage further research and development, we open-source our code, data, and model, enabling adaptation to additional domains and supporting the creation of increasingly robust guardrail models.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b55c5b99-5af7-4e85-9414-595efd26567aBuilds on21
- Training language models to follow instructions with human feedbackLong Ouyang, Jeffrey Wu, Xu Jiang, Diogo Almeida et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 24,707 citations
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- FlashAttention-2: Faster Attention with Better Parallelism and Work PartitioningTri DaoICLR 2024 · 2,600 citations
- HarmBench: A Standardized Evaluation Framework for Automated Red Teaming and Robust RefusalMantas Mazeika, Long Phan, Xuwang Yin, Andy Zou et al.ICML 2024 · 1,031 citations
- Safe RLHF: Safe Reinforcement Learning from Human FeedbackJosef Dai, Xuehai Pan, Ruiyang Sun, Jiaming Ji et al.ICLR 2024 · 656 citations
Related papers
- MrGuard: A Multilingual Reasoning Guardrail for Universal LLM SafetyYahan Yang, Soham Dan, Shuo Li, Dan Roth et al.EMNLP 2025
- R2-Guard: Robust Reasoning Enabled LLM Guardrail via Knowledge-Enhanced Logical ReasoningMintong Kang, Bo LiICLR 2025
- GRAID: Synthetic Data Generation with Geometric Constraints and Multi-Agentic Reflection for Harmful Content DetectionMelissa Kazemi Rad, Alberto Purpura, Himanshu Kumar, Emily Chen et al.EMNLP 2025
- RigorLLM: Resilient Guardrails for Large Language Models against Undesired ContentZhuowen Yuan, Zidi Xiong, Yi Zeng, Ning Yu et al.ICML 2024 · 77 citations
- RSafe: Incentivizing proactive reasoning to build robust and adaptive LLM safeguardsJingnan Zheng, Xiangtian Ji, Yijun Lu, Chenhang Cui et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 17 citations
