Additive Randomized Encodings and Their Applications
Shai Halevi, Yuval Ishai, Eyal Kushilevitz, Tal Rabin
Abstract
Addition of inputs is often the easiest nontrivial function to compute securely. Motivated by several open questions, we ask what can be computed securely given only an oracle that computes the sum. Namely, what functions can be computed in a model where parties can only encode their input locally, then sum up the encodings over some Abelian group , and decode the result to get the function output.
An additive randomized encoding (ARE) of a function maps every input independently into a randomized encoding , such that reveals and nothing else about the inputs. In a robust ARE, the sum of any subset of the only reveals the residual function obtained by restricting the corresponding inputs.
We obtain positive and negative results on ARE. In particular:
-
Information-theoretic ARE. We fully characterize the 2-party functions admitting a perfectly secure ARE. For parties, we show a useful ``capped sum'' function that separates statistical security from perfect security.
-
Computational ARE. We present a general feasibility result, showing that all functions can be computed in this model, under a standard hardness assumption in bilinear groups. We also describe a heuristic lattice-based construction.
-
Robust ARE. We present a similar feasibility result for robust computational ARE based on ideal obfuscation along with standard cryptographic assumptions.
We then describe several applications of ARE and the above results.
-
Under a standard cryptographic assumption, our computational ARE schemes imply the feasibility of general non-interactive secure computation in the shuffle model, where messages from different parties are shuffled. This implies a general utility-preserving compiler from differential privacy in the central model to computational differential privacy in the (non-robust) shuffle model.
-
The existence of information-theoretic robust ARE implies "best-possible" information-theoretic MPC protocols (Halevi et al., TCC 2018) and degree-2 multiparty randomized encodings (Applebaum et al., TCC 2018). This yields new positive results for specific functions in the former model, as well as a simple unifying barrier for obtaining negative results in both models.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- Private Analytics via Streaming, Sketching, and Silently Verifiable ProofsMayank Rathee, Yuwen Zhang, Henry Corrigan-Gibbs, Raluca Ada PopaS&P 2024 · 8 citations
- sfOPA: One-Shot Private Aggregation with Single Client Interaction and Its Applications to Federated LearningHarish Karthikeyan, Antigoni PolychroniadouCRYPTO 2025 · 1 citation
Related papers
- Additive Randomized Encodings from Public Key EncryptionNir Bitansky, Saroja Erabelli, Rachit GargCRYPTO 2025 · 2 citations
- Robust Additive Randomized Encodings from IO and Pseudo-Non-linear CodesNir Bitansky, Sapir FreizeitCRYPTO 2024 · 2 citations
- Quadratic Multiparty Randomized Encodings Beyond Honest Majority and Their ApplicationsBenny Applebaum, Yuval Ishai, Or Karni, Arpita PatraCRYPTO 2022 · 2 citations
- Tight Bounds on the Randomness Complexity of Secure Multiparty ComputationVipul Goyal, Yuval Ishai, Yifan SongCRYPTO 2022 · 2 citations
- Solving Linear Inequalities over the Space of Convex Sets & its Applications to Cryptography and HydrodynamicsSaugata Basu, Hamidreza Amini Khorasgani, Hemanta K. Maji, Hai H. NguyenFOCS 2025 · 1 citation
