Learning Features with Parameter-Free Layers
Dongyoon Han, Young Joon Yoo, Beomyoung Kim, Byeongho Heo
Abstract
Trainable layers such as convolutional building blocks are the standard network design choices by learning parameters to capture the global context through successive spatial operations. When designing an efficient network, trainable layers such as the depthwise convolution is the source of efficiency in the number of parameters and FLOPs, but there was little improvement to the model speed in practice. This paper argues that simple built-in parameter-free operations can be a favorable alternative to the efficient trainable layers replacing spatial operations in a network architecture. We aim to break the stereotype of organizing the spatial operations of building blocks into trainable layers. Extensive experimental analyses based on layer-level studies with fully-trained models and neural architecture searches are provided to investigate whether parameter-free operations such as the max-pool are functional. The studies eventually give us a simple yet effective idea for redesigning network architectures, where the parameter-free operations are heavily used as the main building block without sacrificing the model accuracy as much. Experimental results on the ImageNet dataset demonstrate that the network architectures with parameter-free operations could enjoy the advantages of further efficiency in terms of model speed, the number of the parameters, and FLOPs. Code and ImageNet pretrained models are available at https://github.com/naver-ai/PfLayer .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers3
- Rethink DARTS Search Space and Renovate a New BenchmarkJiuling Zhang, Zhiming DingICML 2023 · 3 citations
- Gramian Attention Heads are Strong yet Efficient Vision LearnersJongbin Ryu, Dongyoon Han, Jongwoo LimICCV 2023 · 3 citations
- SCConv: Spatial and Channel Reconstruction Convolution for Feature RedundancyJiafeng Li, Ying Wen, Lianghua HeCVPR 2023
Builds on12
- An Image is Worth 16x16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at ScaleAlexey Dosovitskiy, Lucas Beyer, Alexander Kolesnikov, Dirk Weissenborn et al.ICLR 2021 · 21,477 citations
- Searching for MobileNetV3Andrew Howard, Ruoming Pang, Hartwig Adam, Quoc V. Le et al.ICCV 2019 · 9,163 citations
- Training data-efficient image transformers & distillation through attentionHugo Touvron, Matthieu Cord, Matthijs Douze, Francisco Massa et al.ICML 2021 · 8,974 citations
- CutMix: Regularization Strategy to Train Strong Classifiers With Localizable FeaturesSangdoo Yun, Dongyoon Han, Sanghyuk Chun, Seong Joon Oh et al.ICCV 2019 · 5,843 citations
- Scaling Vision TransformersXiaohua Zhai, Alexander Kolesnikov, Neil Houlsby, Lucas BeyerCVPR 2022 · 767 citations
Related papers
- RepVGG: Making VGG-Style ConvNets Great AgainXiaohan Ding, Xiangyu Zhang, Ningning Ma, Jungong Han et al.CVPR 2021
- Run, Don't Walk: Chasing Higher FLOPS for Faster Neural NetworksJierun Chen, Shiu-Hong Kao, Hao He, Weipeng Zhuo et al.CVPR 2023
- Fast and Practical Neural Architecture SearchJiequan Cui, Pengguang Chen, Ruiyu Li, Shu Liu et al.ICCV 2019 · 69 citations
- Butterfly Transform: An Efficient FFT Based Neural Architecture DesignKeivan Alizadeh-Vahid, Anish Prabhu, Ali Farhadi, Mohammad RastegariCVPR 2020
- Neural Architecture Search for Lightweight Non-Local NetworksYingwei Li, Xiaojie Jin, Jieru Mei, Xiaochen Lian et al.CVPR 2020
