QuickSel: Quick Selectivity Learning with Mixture Models
Yongjoo Park, Shucheng Zhong, Barzan Mozafari
Abstract
Estimating the selectivity of a query is a key step in almost any cost-based query optimizer. Most of today's databases rely on histograms or samples that are periodically refreshed by re-scanning the data as the underlying data changes. Since frequent scans are costly, these statistics are often stale and lead to poor selectivity estimates. As an alternative to scans, query-driven histograms have been proposed, which refine the histograms based on the actual selectivities of the observed queries. Unfortunately, these approaches are either too costly to use in practice---i.e., require an exponential number of buckets---or quickly lose their advantage as they observe more queries. In this paper, we propose a selectivity learning framework, called QuickSel, which falls into the query-driven paradigm but does not use histograms. Instead, it builds an internal model of the underlying data, which can be refined significantly faster (e.g., only 1.9 milliseconds for 300 queries). This fast refinement allows QuickSel to continuously learn from each query and yield increasingly more accurate selectivity estimates over time. Unlike query-driven histograms, QuickSel relies on a mixture model and a new optimization algorithm for training its model. Our extensive experiments on two real-world datasets confirm that, given the same target accuracy, QuickSel is 34.0x--179.4x faster than state-of-the-art query-driven histograms, including ISOMER and STHoles. Further, given the same space budget, QuickSel is 26.8%--91.8% more accurate than periodically-updated histograms and samples, respectively.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b41e4dff-af94-403a-bbf6-a03cb9d6188dCited by top-tier papers32
- Bao: Making Learned Query Optimization PracticalRyan Marcus, Parimarjan Negi, Hongzi Mao, Nesime Tatbul et al.SIGMOD 2021 · 242 citations
- Deep Unsupervised Cardinality EstimationZongheng Yang, Eric Liang, Amog Kamsetty, Chenggang Wu et al.VLDB 2020 · 206 citations
- Learning Multi-Dimensional IndexesVikram Nathan, Jialin Ding, Mohammad Alizadeh, Tim KraskaSIGMOD 2020 · 180 citations
- Are We Ready For Learned Cardinality Estimation?Xiaoying Wang, Changbo Qu, Weiyuan Wu, Jiannan Wang et al.VLDB 2021 · 156 citations
- NeuroCard: One Cardinality Estimator for All TablesZongheng Yang, Amog Kamsetty, Sifei Luan, Eric Liang et al.VLDB 2021 · 138 citations
Builds on1
Related papers
- Efficiently Approximating Selectivity Functions using Low Overhead Regression ModelsAnshuman Dutt, Chi Wang, Vivek R. Narasayya, Surajit ChaudhuriVLDB 2020 · 45 citations
- Robust Plan Evaluation based on Approximate Probabilistic Machine LearningAmin Kamali, Verena Kantere, Calisto Zuzarte, Vincent CorvinelliVLDB 2025 · 1 citation
- LATEST: Learning-Assisted Selectivity Estimation Over Spatio-Textual StreamsMayur Patil, Amr MagdyICDE 2021 · 4 citations
- Leveraging Query Logs and Machine Learning for Parametric Query OptimizationKapil Vaidya, Anshuman Dutt, Vivek R. Narasayya, Surajit ChaudhuriVLDB 2022 · 20 citations
- Cost-based or Learning-based? A Hybrid Query Optimizer for Query Plan SelectionXiang Yu, Chengliang Chai, Guoliang Li, Jiabin LiuVLDB 2022 · 82 citations
