On the Usage of Continual Learning for Out-of-Distribution Generalization in Pre-trained Language Models of Code
Martin Weyssow, Xin Zhou, Kisub Kim, David Lo, Houari A. Sahraoui
Abstract
Pre-trained language models (PLMs) have become a prevalent technique in deep learning for code, utilizing a two-stage pre-training and fine-tuning procedure to acquire general knowledge about code and specialize in a variety of downstream tasks. However, the dynamic nature of software codebases poses a challenge to the effectiveness and robustness of PLMs. In particular, world-realistic scenarios potentially lead to significant differences between the distribution of the pre-training and test data, i.e., distribution shift, resulting in a degradation of the PLM's performance on downstream tasks. In this paper, we stress the need for adapting PLMs of code to software data whose distribution changes over time, a crucial problem that has been overlooked in previous works. The motivation of this work is to consider the PLM in a non-stationary environment, where fine-tuning data evolves over time according to a software evolution scenario. Specifically, we design a scenario where the model needs to learn from a stream of programs containing new, unseen APIs over time. We study two widely used PLM architectures, i.e., a GPT2 decoder and a RoBERTa encoder, on two downstream tasks, API call and API usage prediction. We demonstrate that the most commonly used fine-tuning technique from prior work is not robust enough to handle the dynamic nature of APIs, leading to the loss of previously acquired knowledge i.e., catastrophic forgetting. To address these issues, we implement five continual learning approaches, including replay-based and regularization-based methods. Our findings demonstrate that utilizing these straightforward methods effectively mitigates catastrophic forgetting in PLMs across both downstream tasks while achieving comparable or superior performance.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Language Models are Few-Shot LearnersTom B. Brown, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, Melanie Subbiah et al.NeurIPS 2020 · 64,255 citations
- WILDS: A Benchmark of in-the-Wild Distribution ShiftsPang Wei Koh, Shiori Sagawa, Henrik Marklund, Sang Michael Xie et al.ICML 2021 · 1,773 citations
- CodeT5: Identifier-aware Unified Pre-trained Encoder-Decoder Models for Code Understanding and GenerationYue Wang, Weishi Wang, Shafiq R. Joty, Steven C. H. HoiEMNLP 2021 · 1,224 citations
- DyTox: Transformers for Continual Learning with DYnamic TOken eXpansionArthur Douillard, Alexandre Ramé, Guillaume Couairon, Matthieu CordCVPR 2022 · 315 citations
- CC2Vec: distributed representations of code changesThong Hoang, Hong Jin Kang, David Lo, Julia LawallICSE 2020 · 169 citations
Related papers
- Learning Dynamics in Continual Pre-Training for Large Language ModelsXingjin Wang, Howe Tissue, Lu Wang, Linjing Li et al.ICML 2025
- Towards Understanding Continual Factual Knowledge Acquisition of Language Models: From Theory to AlgorithmHaoyu Wang, yifan shang, Zhongxiang Sun, Weijie Yu et al.ICML 2026
- Bridging Pre-trained Models and Downstream Tasks for Source Code UnderstandingDeze Wang, Zhouyang Jia, Shanshan Li, Yue Yu et al.ICSE 2022 · 68 citations
- Discrete Key-Value BottleneckFrederik Träuble, Anirudh Goyal, Nasim Rahaman, Michael Curtis Mozer et al.ICML 2023 · 25 citations
- Pretrained Language Model in Continual Learning: A Comparative StudyTongtong Wu, Massimo Caccia, Zhuang Li, Yuan-Fang Li et al.ICLR 2022 · 76 citations
