The Unsung Heroes of Facebook Groups Moderation: A Case Study of Moderation Practices and Tools
Tina Kuo, Alicia Hernani, Jens Grossklags
Abstract
Volunteer moderators have the power to shape society through their influence on online discourse. However, the growing scale of online interactions increasingly presents significant hurdles for meaningful moderation. Furthermore, there are only limited tools available to assist volunteers with their work. Our work aims to meaningfully explore the potential of AI-driven, automated moderation tools for social media to assist volunteer moderators. One key aspect is to investigate the degree to which tools must become personalizable and context-sensitive in order to not just delete unsavory content and ban trolls, but to adapt to the millions of online communities on social media mega-platforms that rely on volunteer moderation. In this study, we conduct semi-structured interviews with 26 Facebook Group moderators in order to better understand moderation tasks and their associated challenges. Through qualitative analysis of the interview data, we identify and address the most pressing themes in the challenges they face daily. Using interview insights, we conceptualize three tools with automated features that assist them in their most challenging tasks and problems. We then evaluate the tools for usability and acceptance using a survey drawing on the technology acceptance literature with 22 of the same moderators. Qualitative and descriptive analyses of the survey data show that context-sensitive, agency-maintaining tools in addition to trial experience are key to mass adoption by volunteer moderators in order to build trust in the validity of the moderation technology.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Your agent calls
Lunesearch_papers
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers get b33e2cfb-e394-45cc-9ad8-725b86ce0627Cited by top-tier papers15
- Trouble in Paradise? Understanding Mastodon Admin's Motivations, Experiences, and Challenges Running Decentralised Social MediaZhilin Zhang, Jun Zhao, Ge Wang, Samantha-Kaye Johnston et al.CSCW 2024 · 15 citations
- Breaking the Silence: Investigating Which Types of Moderation Reduce Negative Effects of Sexist Social Media ContentJulia Sasse, Jens GrossklagsCSCW 2023 · 12 citations
- Conversational Agents to Facilitate Deliberation on Harmful Content in WhatsApp GroupsDhruv Agarwal, Farhana Shahid, Aditya VashisthaCSCW 2024 · 11 citations
- Investigating Moderation Challenges to Combating Hate and Harassment: The Case of Mod-Admin Power Dynamics and Feature Misuse on RedditMadiha Tabassum, Alana Mackey, Ashley Schuett, Ada LernerUSENIX Security 2024 · 10 citations
- One Style Does Not Regulate All: Moderation Practices in Public and Private WhatsApp GroupsFarhana Shahid, Dhruv Agarwal, Aditya VashisthaCSCW 2025 · 9 citations
Related papers
- Toxicity Detection is NOT all you Need: Measuring the Gaps to Supporting Volunteer Content Moderators through a User-Centric MethodYang Trista Cao, Lovely-Frances Domingo, Sarah A. Gilbert, Michelle L. Mazurek et al.EMNLP 2024 · 4 citations
- Personalizing Content Moderation on Social Media: User Perspectives on Moderation Choices, Interface Design, and LaborShagun Jhaver, Alice Qian Zhang, Quan Ze Chen, Nikhila Natarajan et al.CSCW 2023 · 87 citations
- "Ignorance is not Bliss": Designing Personalized Moderation to Address Ableist Hate on Social MediaSharon Heung, Lucy Jiang, Shiri Azenkot, Aditya VashisthaCHI 2025 · 14 citations
- ConvEx: A Visual Conversation Exploration System for Discord ModeratorsFrederick Choi, Tanvi Bajpai, Sowmya Pratipati, Eshwar ChandrasekharanCSCW 2023 · 11 citations
- Understanding User Needs and Attitudes for Privacy Protection Tools in Online Visual Content SharingChun-Wei Chiang, Harry Yizhou Tian, Ming YinCSCW 2025 · 4 citations
