Revisiting Security Estimation for LWE with Hints from a Geometric Perspective
Dana Dachman-Soled, Huijing Gong, Tom Hanson, Hunter Kippen
Abstract
The Distorted Bounded Distance Decoding Problem (DBDD) was introduced by Dachman-Soled et al. [Crypto ’20] as an intermediate problem between LWE and unique-SVP (uSVP). They presented an approach that reduces an LWE instance to a DBDD instance, integrates side information (or “hints”) into the DBDD instance, and finally reduces it to a uSVP instance, which can be solved via lattice reduction. They showed that this principled approach can lead to algorithms for side-channel attacks that perform better than ad-hoc algorithms that do not rely on lattice reduction. The current work focuses on new methods for integrating hints into a DBDD instance. We view hints from a geometric perspective, as opposed to the distributional perspective from the prior work. Our approach provides the rigorous promise that, as hints are integrated into the DBDD instance, the correct solution remains a lattice point contained in the specified ellipsoid. We instantiate our approach with two new types of hints: (1) Inequality hints, corresponding to the region of intersection of an ellipsoid and a halfspace; (2) Combined hints, corresponding to the region of intersection of two ellipsoids. Since the regions in (1) and (2) are not necessarily ellipsoids, we replace them with ellipsoidal approximations that circumscribe the region of intersection. Perfect hints are reconsidered as the region of intersection of an ellipsoid and a hyperplane, which is itself an ellipsoid. The compatibility of “approximate,” “modular,” and “short vector” hints from the prior work is examined. We apply our techniques to the decryption failure and side-channel attack settings. We show that “inequality hints” can be used to model decryption failures, and that our new approach yields a geometric analogue of the “failure boosting” technique of D’anvers et al. [ePrint, ’18]. We also show that “combined hints” can be used to fuse information from a decryption failure and a side-channel attack, and provide rigorous guarantees despite the data being non-Gaussian. We provide experimental data for both applications. The code that we have developed to implement the integration of hints and hardness estimates extends the Toolkit from prior work and has been released publicly.
Ask about this paper
Ask your agent about it.
Lune has read the top-tier papers around this one, so every answer names the papers it rests on.
Cited by top-tier papers2
- K-Waay: Fast and Deniable Post-Quantum X3DH without Ring SignaturesDaniel Collins, Loïs Huguenin-Dumittan, Ngoc Khanh Nguyen, Nicolas Rolin et al.USENIX Security 2024 · 12 citations
- The Complexity of Algebraic Algorithms for LWEMatthias Johann SteinerEUROCRYPT 2024 · 5 citations
Related papers
- LWE with Side Information: Attacks and Concrete Security EstimationDana Dachman-Soled, Léo Ducas, Huijing Gong, Mélissa RossiCRYPTO 2020 · 162 citations
- A Generic Framework for Side-Channel Attacks Against LWE-Based CryptosystemsJulius Hermelink, Silvan Streit, Erik Mårtensson, Richard PetriEUROCRYPT 2025 · 6 citations
- From Perfect to Approximate Hints: Efficient LWE Secret Recovery Leveraging Low Hamming WeightMinki Hhan, Ga Hee Hong, Jiseung Kim, Changmin Lee et al.S&P 2026
- Refined Attack on LWE with Hints: Constructing Lattice via Gaussian EliminationJinzheng Cao, Haodong Jiang, Qingfeng ChengCRYPTO 2025 · 3 citations
- (One) Failure Is Not an Option: Bootstrapping the Search for Failures in Lattice-Based Encryption SchemesJan-Pieter D'Anvers, Mélissa Rossi, Fernando VirdiaEUROCRYPT 2020 · 2 citations
