DOUBT: Decoupled Object-level Understanding and Bridging via vMF-based Trustworthiness for Hallucination Detection in MLLMs

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) frequently produce hallucinations (i.e., assertions that contradict the image or facts), undermining reliability in high-risk applications. Existing detection approaches typically feed images and texts jointly and estimate hallucination scores by measuring the consistency of model outputs. However, because the visual module often lags behind the language module in understanding and reasoning, MLLMs can repeatedly produce similar yet incorrect answers, yielding deceptively high measured trustworthiness and therefore missed detections. To address this, we propose a simple yet effective model-agnostic method, dubbed Decoupled Object-level Understanding and Bridging via vMF-based Trustworthiness (DOUBT). DOUBT i) elicits richer object-aware responses by decoupling object recognition from relational reasoning via a two-step prompting scheme (Object-level Understanding and Bridging, OUB), and ii) measures reliability with a von Mises–Fisher (vMF)-based trustworthiness metric that is more stable than semantic-entropy metrics under small-sample regimes. Specifically, OUB first prompts the model to list recognized objects, and then conditions chain-of-thought reasoning on those objects to produce object-bridged responses. For trustworthiness estimation, we replace conventional measures with the proposed vMF-based metric, which is robust even under low-sample settings and exhibits smoother behavior than prior techniques. Extensive experiments and ablation studies across multiple benchmarks demonstrate that DOUBT consistently outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, offering a robust and generalizable solution for hallucination detection in MLLMs.