Lune

ICML2024Top-tier venue

Diffusion Posterior Sampling is Computationally Intractable

Shivam Gupta, Ajil Jalal, Aditya Parulekar, Eric Price, Zhiyang Xun

2024Year
18Citations
6Top-tier citations

Abstract

Diffusion models are a remarkably effective way of learning and sampling from a distribution p(x)p(x). In posterior sampling, one is also given a measurement model p(y∣x)p(y \mid x) and a measurement yy, and would like to sample from p(x∣y)p(x \mid y). Posterior sampling is useful for tasks such as inpainting, super-resolution, and MRI reconstruction, so a number of recent works have given algorithms to heuristically approximate it; but none are known to converge to the correct distribution in polynomial time. In this paper we show that posterior sampling is computationally intractable: under the most basic assumption in cryptography -- that one-way functions exist -- there are instances for which every algorithm takes superpolynomial time, even though unconditional sampling is provably fast. We also show that the exponential-time rejection sampling algorithm is essentially optimal under the stronger plausible assumption that there are one-way functions that take exponential time to invert.

Ask about this paper

Your agent reads all of it.

Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.

Questions to start from

Your agent calls

Luneget_paper_fulltext

Ask in Lune

Free to start. No credit card required.

lune papers fulltext b23f9a3e-0f06-4f06-ad0f-42f3ec6854eb

Cited by top-tier papers6

Ask how each one uses it

Builds on2

Related papers

Dusk over the sea between two cliffs drawn in fine vertical lines