N-ary Constituent Tree Parsing with Recursive Semi-Markov Model
Xin Xin, Jinlong Li, Zeqi Tan
Abstract
In this paper, we study the task of graph-based constituent parsing in the setting that binarization is not conducted as a pre-processing step, where a constituent tree may consist of nodes with more than two children. Previous graphbased methods on this setting typically generate hidden nodes with the dummy label inside the n-ary nodes, in order to transform the tree into a binary tree for prediction. The limitation is that the hidden nodes break the sibling relations of the n-ary node's children. Consequently, the dependencies of such sibling constituents might not be accurately modeled and is being ignored. To solve this limitation, we propose a novel graph-based framework, which is called "recursive semi-Markov model". The main idea is to utilize 1-order semi-Markov model to predict the immediate children sequence of a constituent candidate, which then recursively serves as a child candidate of its parent. In this manner, the dependencies of sibling constituents can be described by 1-order transition features, which solves the above limitation. Through experiments, the proposed framework obtains the F1 of 95.92% and 92.50% on the datasets of PTB and CTB 5.1 respectively. Specially, the recursive semi-Markov model shows advantages in modeling nodes with more than two children, whose average F1 can be improved by 0.3-1.1 points in PTB and 2.3-6.8 points in CTB 5.1.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b2213127-b783-4325-9c9b-0ded79bdee52Cited by top-tier papers6
- Bottom-Up Constituency Parsing and Nested Named Entity Recognition with Pointer NetworksSonglin Yang, Kewei TuACL 2022 · 59 citations
- Headed-Span-Based Projective Dependency ParsingSonglin Yang, Kewei TuACL 2022 · 16 citations
- To be Continuous, or to be Discrete, Those are Bits of QuestionsYiran Wang, Masao UtiyamaACL 2024 · 3 citations
- DeciX: Explain Deep Learning Based Code Generation ApplicationsSimin Chen, Zexin Li, Wei Yang, Cong LiuFSE 2024 · 1 citation
- Don't Parse, Choose Spans! Continuous and Discontinuous Constituency Parsing via Autoregressive Span SelectionSonglin Yang, Kewei TuACL 2023 · 1 citation
Builds on1
Related papers
- Improving Unsupervised Constituency Parsing via Maximizing Semantic InformationJunjie Chen, Xiangheng He, Yusuke Miyao, Danushka BollegalaICLR 2025
- Efficient Constituency Parsing by PointingThanh-Tung Nguyen, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Shafiq R. Joty, Xiaoli LiACL 2020 · 11 citations
- Unsupervised Parsing via Constituency TestsSteven Cao, Nikita Kitaev, Dan KleinEMNLP 2020 · 25 citations
- Incorporating Constituent Syntax for Coreference ResolutionFan Jiang, Trevor CohnAAAI 2022 · 6 citations
- A Conditional Splitting Framework for Efficient Constituency ParsingThanh-Tung Nguyen, Xuan-Phi Nguyen, Shafiq R. Joty, Xiaoli LiACL 2021
