Latent Planning Emerges with Scale
Michael Hanna, Emmanuel Ameisen
Abstract
LLMs can perform seemingly planning-intensive tasks, like writing coherent stories or functioning code, without explicitly verbalizing a plan; however, the extent to which they implicitly plan is unknown. In this paper, we define latent planning as occurring when LLMs possess internal planning representations that (1) cause the generation of a specific future token or concept, and (2) shape preceding context to license said future token or concept. We study the Qwen-3 family (0.6B-14B) on simple planning tasks, finding that latent planning ability increases with scale. Models that plan possess features that represent a planned-for word like accountant, and cause them to output an rather than a; moreover, even the less-successful Qwen-3 4B-8B have nascent planning mechanisms. On the more complex task of completing rhyming couplets, we find that models often identify a rhyme ahead of time, but even large models seldom plan far ahead. However, we can elicit some planning that increases with scale when steering models towards planned words in prose. In sum, we offer a framework for measuring planning and mechanistic evidence of how models' planning abilities grow with scale. * Completed as part of the Anthropic Fellows Program. 1 Explicit, verbalized planning, as in LLMs' chains of thought, is better studied (Kambhampati et al., 2024) .
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b217fec5-ff35-40c6-9faa-d1ba475a30a8Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on13
- Sparse Autoencoders Find Highly Interpretable Features in Language ModelsRobert Huben, Hoagy Cunningham, Logan Riggs Smith, Aidan Ewart et al.ICLR 2024 · 1,072 citations
- Towards Automated Circuit Discovery for Mechanistic InterpretabilityArthur Conmy, Augustine N. Mavor-Parker, Aengus Lynch, Stefan Heimersheim et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 861 citations
- How does GPT-2 compute greater-than?: Interpreting mathematical abilities in a pre-trained language modelMichael Hanna, Ollie Liu, Alexandre VariengienNeurIPS 2023 · 251 citations
- Transcoders find interpretable LLM feature circuitsJacob Dunefsky, Philippe Chlenski, Neel NandaNeurIPS 2024 · 222 citations
- Patchscopes: A Unifying Framework for Inspecting Hidden Representations of Language ModelsAsma Ghandeharioun, Avi Caciularu, Adam Pearce, Lucas Dixon et al.ICML 2024 · 197 citations
Related papers
- Emergent Response Planning in LLMsZhichen Dong, Zhanhui Zhou, Zhixuan Liu, Chao Yang et al.ICML 2025
- Unlocking the Future: Exploring Look-Ahead Planning Mechanistic Interpretability in Large Language ModelsTianyi Men, Pengfei Cao, Zhuoran Jin, Yubo Chen et al.EMNLP 2024 · 20 citations
- LLMs Can Plan Only If We Tell ThemBilgehan Sel, Ruoxi Jia, Ming JinICLR 2025
- Internal Planning in Language Models: Characterizing Horizon and Branch AwarenessMuhammed Ustaomeroglu, Baris Askin, Gauri Joshi, Carlee Joe-Wong et al.ICLR 2026
- How Far Ahead Do LLMs Plan? Uncovering the Latent Horizon in Chain-of-Thought ReasoningLiyan Xu, Mo Yu, Fandong Meng, Jie ZhouICML 2026 · 1 citation
