Do VLMs Perceive or Recall? Probing Visual Perception vs. Memory with Classic Visual Illusions
Xiaoxiao Sun, Mingyang Li, Kun Yuan, Min Woo Sun, Mark Endo, Shengguang Wu, Changlin Li, Yuhui Zhang, Zeyu Wang, Serena Yeung-Levy
Abstract
Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often answer classic visual illusions "correctly" on original images, yet persist with the same responses when illusion factors are inverted, even though the visual change is obvious to humans. This raises a fundamental question: do VLMs perceive visual changes or merely recall memorized patterns? While several studies have noted this phenomenon, the underlying causes remain unclear. To move from observations to systematic understanding, this paper introduces VI-Probe, a controllable visual-illusion framework with graded perturbations and matched visual controls (without illusion inducer) that disentangles visually grounded perception from language-driven recall. Unlike prior work that focuses on averaged accuracy, we measure stability and sensitivity using Polarity-Flip Consistency, Template Fixation Index, and an illusion multiplier normalized against matched controls. Experiments across different families reveal that response persistence arises from heterogeneous causes rather than a single mechanism. For instance, GPT-5 exhibits memory override, Claude-Opus-4.1 shows perception-memory competition, while Qwen variants suggest visual-processing limits. Our findings challenge single-cause views and motivate probing-based evaluation that measures both knowledge and sensitivity to controlled visual change. Data and code are available at VI-Probe Website.
0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 claude-haiku-4.5 claude-sonnet-4.5 gpt-5 Yes No No Yes No Yes GT Q: Are the two orange circles of the same size? Original Perturbed 0.1 0.3 0.5 Acc
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Your agent calls
Luneget_paper_fulltext
Free to start. No credit card required.
Terminal
Install the CLIlune papers fulltext b1ff77d2-d7e0-4c03-bc75-6d5a1762192cBuilds on14
- Learning Transferable Visual Models From Natural Language SupervisionAlec Radford, Jong Wook Kim, Chris Hallacy, Aditya Ramesh et al.ICML 2021 · 47,906 citations
- Visual Instruction TuningHaotian Liu, Chunyuan Li, Qingyang Wu, Yong Jae LeeNeurIPS 2023 · 11,349 citations
- Language (Technology) is Power: A Critical Survey of "Bias" in NLPSu Lin Blodgett, Solon Barocas, Hal Daumé III, Hanna M. WallachACL 2020 · 68 citations
- Vision Language Models are BiasedAn Vo, Khai-Nguyen Nguyen, Mohammad Reza Taesiri, Thi Tuong Vy Dang et al.ICLR 2026 · 68 citations
- Seeing but Not Believing: Probing the Disconnect Between Visual Attention and Answer Correctness in VLMsZhining Liu, Ziyi Chen, Hui Liu, Chen Luo et al.ICLR 2026 · 47 citations
Related papers
- Grounding Visual Illusions in Language: Do Vision-Language Models Perceive Illusions Like Humans?Yichi Zhang, Jiayi Pan, Yuchen Zhou, Rui Pan et al.EMNLP 2023 · 9 citations
- VLMs have Tunnel Vision: Evaluating Nonlocal Visual Reasoning in Leading VLMsShmuel Berman, Jia DengNeurIPS 2025 · 7 citations
- Hallusionbench: An Advanced Diagnostic Suite for Entangled Language Hallucination and Visual Illusion in Large Vision-Language ModelsTianrui Guan, Fuxiao Liu, Xiyang Wu, Ruiqi Xian et al.CVPR 2024
- Evaluating Model Perception of Color Illusions in Photorealistic ScenesLingjun Mao, Zineng Tang, Alane SuhrCVPR 2025
- Unveiling the Tapestry of Consistency in Large Vision-Language ModelsYuan Zhang, Fei Xiao, Tao Huang, Chun-Kai Fan et al.NeurIPS 2024 · 27 citations
