Fine-Grained Optimality of Partially Dynamic Shortest Paths and More
Barna Saha, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu, Christopher Ye
Abstract
Single Source Shortest Paths (SSSP) is among the most well-studied problems in computer science. In the incremental (resp. decremental) setting, the goal is to maintain distances from a fixed source in a graph undergoing edge insertions (resp. deletions). A long line of research culminated in a near-optimal deterministic (1 + ε)-approximate data structure with m 1+o(1) total update time over all m updates by Bernstein, Probst Gutenberg and Saranurak [FOCS 2021]. However, there has been remarkably little progress on the exact SSSP problem beyond Even and Shiloach's algorithm [J. ACM 1981] for unweighted graphs. For weighted graphs, there are no exact algorithms beyond recomputing SSSP from scratch in O(m 2 ) total update time, even for the simpler Single-Source Single-Target Shortest Path problem (stSP). Despite this lack of progress, known (conditional) lower bounds only rule out algorithms with amortized update time better than m 1/2-o(1) in dense graphs.
In this paper, we give a tight (conditional) lower bound: any partially dynamic exact stSP algorithm requires m 2-o(1) total update time for any sparsity m. We thus resolve the complexity of partially dynamic shortest paths, and separate the hardness of exact and approximate shortest paths, giving evidence as to why no non-trivial exact algorithms have been obtained while fast approximation algorithms are known.
Moreover, we give tight bounds on the complexity of combinatorial algorithms for several path problems that have been studied in the static setting since early sixties: Node-weighted shortest paths (studied alongside edge-weighted shortest paths), bottleneck paths (early work dates back to 1960), and earliest arrivals (early work dates back to 1958). These bounds rule out any nontrivial combinatorial algorithms for these problems in the partially dynamic setting. Interestingly, for all of the above path-variant problems, we obtain faster partially dynamic algorithms using fast matrix multiplication.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on18
- New Bounds for Matrix Multiplication: from Alpha to OmegaVirginia Vassilevska Williams, Yinzhan Xu, Zixuan Xu, Renfei ZhouSODA 2024 · 90 citations
- Faster Matrix Multiplication via Asymmetric HashingRan Duan, Hongxun Wu, Renfei ZhouFOCS 2023 · 54 citations
- Circulation Control for Faster Minimum Cost Flow in Unit-Capacity GraphsKyriakos Axiotis, Aleksander Madry, Adrian VladuFOCS 2020 · 43 citations
- Deterministic Decremental Reachability, SCC, and Shortest Paths via Directed Expanders and Congestion BalancingAaron Bernstein, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Thatchaphol SaranurakFOCS 2020 · 35 citations
- Deterministic Decremental SSSP and Approximate Min-Cost Flow in Almost-Linear TimeAaron Bernstein, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Thatchaphol SaranurakFOCS 2021 · 27 citations
Related papers
- New algorithms and hardness for incremental single-source shortest paths in directed graphsMaximilian Probst Gutenberg, Virginia Vassilevska Williams, Nicole WeinSTOC 2020 · 21 citations
- Deterministic Algorithms for Decremental Shortest Paths via Layered Core DecompositionJulia Chuzhoy, Thatchaphol SaranurakSODA 2021 · 24 citations
- Incremental SSSP for Sparse Digraphs Beyond the Hopset BarrierRasmus Kyng, Simon Meierhans, Maximilian Probst GutenbergSODA 2022 · 3 citations
- Near-Optimal Decremental SSSP in Dense Weighted DigraphsAaron Bernstein, Maximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-NilsenFOCS 2020 · 16 citations
- Deterministic Algorithms for Decremental Approximate Shortest Paths: Faster and SimplerMaximilian Probst Gutenberg, Christian Wulff-NilsenSODA 2020 · 20 citations
