Agentic RL Scaling Law: Spontaneous Code Execution for Mathematical Problem Solving
Xinji Mai, Haotian Xu, Xing W, Weinong Wang, Yingying Zhang, Wenqiang Zhang
Abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) often struggle with mathematical reasoning tasks requiring precise, verifiable computation. While Reinforcement Learning (RL) from outcome-based rewards enhances text-based reasoning, understanding how agents autonomously learn to leverage external tools like code execution remains crucial. We investigate RL from outcome-based rewards for Tool-Integrated Reasoning, ZeroTIR, training base LLMs to spontaneously generate and execute Python code for mathematical problems without supervised tool-use examples. Our central contribution is we demonstrate that as RL training progresses, key metrics scale predictably. Specifically, we observe strong positive correlations where increased training steps lead to increases in the spontaneous code execution frequency, the average response length, and, critically, the final task accuracy. This suggests a quantifiable relationship between computational effort invested in training and the emergence of effective, tool-augmented reasoning strategies. We implement a robust framework featuring a decoupled code execution environment and validate our findings across standard RL algorithms and frameworks. Experiments show ZeroTIR significantly surpasses non-tool ZeroRL baselines on challenging math benchmarks. Our findings provide a foundational understanding of how autonomous tool use is acquired and scales within Agent RL, offering a reproducible benchmark for future studies.
Code is released at https://github.com/yyht/openrlhf_async_pipline.
Ask about this paper
Your agent reads all of it.
Lune indexed this paper to the last equation, along with the top-tier papers that cite it. Ask a question and the answer quotes them.
Cited by top-tier papers1
Ask how each one uses itBuilds on11
- Chain-of-Thought Prompting Elicits Reasoning in Large Language ModelsJason Wei, Xuezhi Wang, Dale Schuurmans, Maarten Bosma et al.NeurIPS 2022 · 22,562 citations
- Toolformer: Language Models Can Teach Themselves to Use ToolsTimo Schick, Jane Dwivedi-Yu, Roberto Dessì, Roberta Raileanu et al.NeurIPS 2023 · 5,989 citations
- Scaling Laws for Reward Model OveroptimizationLeo Gao, John Schulman, Jacob HiltonICML 2023 · 963 citations
- PAL: Program-aided Language ModelsLuyu Gao, Aman Madaan, Shuyan Zhou, Uri Alon et al.ICML 2023 · 700 citations
- Open-Reasoner-Zero: An Open Source Approach to Scaling Up Reinforcement Learning on the Base ModelJingcheng Hu, Yinmin Zhang, Qi Han, Daxin Jiang et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 533 citations
Related papers
- THOR: Tool-Integrated Hierarchical Optimization via RL for Mathematical ReasoningQikai Chang, Zhenrong Zhang, Pengfei Hu, Jun Du et al.ICLR 2026 · 8 citations
- ReTool: Reinforcement Learning for Strategic Tool Use in LLMsJiazhan Feng, Shijue Huang, Xingwei Qu, Ge Zhang et al.ICLR 2026 · 406 citations
- Towards Effective Code-Integrated ReasoningFei Bai, Yingqian Min, Beichen Zhang, Zhipeng Chen et al.AAAI 2026
- Empowering LLM Tool Invocation with Tool-call Reward ModelDa Ma, Ziyue Yang, Hongshen Xu, Haotian Fang et al.ICLR 2026
- Absolute Zero: Reinforced Self-play Reasoning with Zero DataAndrew Zhao, Yiran Wu, Tong Wu, Quentin Xu et al.NeurIPS 2025 · 361 citations
